2014 OPR After Week Three Events

[Ed Law]

The OPR/CCWM week 3 numbers have been updated. Please go to

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2174

There are a number of points I would like to make:

1) Team Standings for Centerline is now posted on FIRST website. I have recalculated the Sub-OPR numbers.

2) The alliance selection order for Mexico City posted on CD is not correct. I posted what my program calculated. I will update this next week if somebody can post the actual alliance selection order.

4) Quite a few regional/districts this week have incomplete twitter data so adjusted OPRs cannot be calculated for those events.

5) To the 3 people who jumped the gun and downloaded the file before I am ready to post this, you will need to download again because there is an error in that file.

If you find any error or have any questions, please let me know.

[dodar]

Anyway to get this for Excel 2003?

[jspatz1]

In the "Adjusted OPR Results" page, should GKC and Dallas be showing zeros?

[Woolly]

Originally Posted by jspatz1

In the "Adjusted OPR Results" page, should GKC and Dallas be showing zeros?

I would guess that the Adjusted OPR relies on data from the FMS Twitter feed, which was down for most of Friday at GKC.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by Woolly

I would guess that the Adjusted OPR relies on data from the FMS Twitter feed,

That would be correct.

There is no way to isolate the foul points using only the official MatchResults and TeamStandings data.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by dodar

Anyway to get this for Excel 2003?

Ed tried to "save as" XLS for me, but it caused his computer to freeze up.

[jspatz1]

Originally Posted by Ether

That would be correct.

There is no way to isolate the foul points using only the official MatchResults and TeamStandings data.

So I take it the OPR Rank and Max for that page are incorrect.

[Ed Law]

You are correct. It is only a comparison between teams that attended events that had full twitter data. It is not all the teams.

[mott]

Originally Posted by Ed Law

You are correct. It is only a comparison between teams that attended events that had full twitter data. It is not all the teams.

Is this also the situation with the missing Utah data?

[Ed Law]

Originally Posted by mott

Is this also the situation with the missing Utah data?

Yes, Utah is also missing Twitter data so foul points cannot be removed from final score.

[jarotter]

Originally Posted by Ed Law

The OPR/CCWM week 3 numbers have been updated. Please go to

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2174

There are a number of points I would like to make:

1) Team Standings for Centerline is now posted on FIRST website. I have recalculated the Sub-OPR numbers.

2) The alliance selection order for Mexico City posted on CD is not correct. I posted what my program calculated. I will update this next week if somebody can post the actual alliance selection order.

4) Quite a few regional/districts this week have incomplete twitter data so adjusted OPRs cannot be calculated for those events.

5) To the 3 people who jumped the gun and downloaded the file before I am ready to post this, you will need to download again because there is an error in that file.

If you find any error or have any questions, please let me know.

The alliance selection went as follows in Mexico City
1. 3472 3478 3933
2. 3794 2283 3480
3. 4400 3526 5312
4. 4403 3158 4977
5. 4775 3522 4667
6. 4262 5133 4735
---------------------------------------
I'm pretty sure of those six, but the last two are kind of blurry
7. 4673 4635 4820
8. 4355 4401 4742