Over six years of attending FRC events as a spectator, and now four as a team member, I, and other FRC team members I know, have had safety inspectors ask us to switch out our lightly reflective (they're not like sunglasses) safety glasses for non-reflective ones. FRC's guidelines on the matter:
Quote:
|
Wear ANSI-approved, UL Listed, or CSA rated non-shaded safety glasses. Lightly tinted Rose, Blue, Amber tints are FIRST approved, but reflective lenses are not (eyes must be clearly visible to others).
|
What is the reasoning behind the illegality of reflective safety glasses? I've heard reasons ranging from "we must be able to see where you're looking when pushing a robot cart" (seems a little ridiculous to me) and "If you're hurt, the paramedics will need to be able to see your eyes" (if this is the case, why couldn't they just remove the safety glasses?). I must be missing something.
What do you think? Is there a very good reason or explanation that I'm missing? Do you agree with this rule? If you were in charge of FIRST safety guidelines, would you keep this guideline in the books?
__________________
This is our Robot. There are many like it, but this one is ours.
Measure twice, cut once, curse, buy more, and cut again.
2014- Excellence in Engineering (UNH), District Chairman's Award (NU), #8 Quarterfinalist (NECMP), Winner (Mainely Spirit)
2013- Semifinalists (Battlecry@WPI) Winner (Mainely Spirit)
2012- Regional Chairman's (GSR), Finalists as the #11 Alliance Captain (Battlecry@WPI)
2011-Xerox Creativity Award (GSR), Semifinalists (GSR) Innovation in Control (Virginia)
2010-Champion (GSR), Undefeated (Chesapeake), Coopertition Award (Chesapeake), Quarterfinalists (Galileo) 8th AC (IRI)
2008-Undefeated (GSR), Xerox Creativity Award (GSR)
If a team wants to cheat then it does nothing but give them a bad cloud hanging over their own heads. - Jon K. [more] 
Threaded Mode