|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#211
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Quote:
|
|
#212
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
No I am upset about how teams payed major money for that regional and for you guys to just treat the finals like its an opportunity to make money and then say well 500 isnt alot of money to some teams like ours that is major money. If youre not going to give it your all and try to win the regional then don't participate in eliminations there are tons of teams who would of loved to have your spot and would of played a tough match to try to get that win.
|
|
#213
|
||||
|
||||
|
The fact the people are making such a big deal over how two teams decided to play the game and had fun doing it, is the problem.
They didn't play the game how you would if liked, deal with it. Unless you have asked the GDC on how they'd like to see the game played, don't say it isn't in the spirit of things. The monetary reward obviously wasn't the goal of that match, it was seeing if they could complete the challenge. If you want to complain that the reward influenced them, then you better get rid or all the awards FRC has other then winning a regional. |
|
#214
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Quote:
What better strategy was there to win the second match? Play pure defense and not score at all? We had one good defensive robot on our alliance, they had two. What else could we do? I don't get it. Last edited by MrForbes : 24-03-2014 at 17:00. |
|
#215
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Its not the idea of being perfect a HOF team is suppose to set an example for those younger teams.
|
|
#216
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Quote:
|
|
#217
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Quote:
As a FIRSTer, i want teams giving all they got to win 100% of the time. Seems like here it didnt happen. |
|
#218
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Are you kidding me please dont tell me you just said that. You're obviously going to do better when there is no one playing def on you.
|
|
#219
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are ways to quantity and objectify the quality of a match/game.
Late, back and forth lead charges, upset potential, buzzer beaters/last second scores, and overall game significance all contribute to the quality of a game and all can be assessed in an objective manner. |
|
#220
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Sorry, I was just happy about making over 300 points, Guess I should have curbed my enthusiasm. I had no idea this would all happen. I would have jumped on the other thread if I wanted to get into all this. It has been very educational though. I am always willing to learn. I am looking at the bright side.
|
|
#221
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
The score ratio between the two alliances was higher for blue in the 2nd match. So yes, the Blue alliance did better. They improved much more than we did.
|
|
#222
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
They improved the MOV by 3 points.
|
|
#223
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
You are right
|
|
#224
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Quote:
What would your approach be, other than how we played the first match? That didn't work out so well. I'd really like to know how to win a match like that. |
|
#225
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Did you really just imply that you agreed to this "challenge" in the hope that you would have a better chance of winning without defense? Please tell me that's not what you meant. That's even worse than the idea that your alliance had given up.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|