301 points! and could have done more

[Dave McLaughlin]

Originally Posted by Nirvash

I think the better question would be if an alliance is allowed to discuss strategies with an opposing alliance that may alter match play.

Yes, discussing strategies that revolve around completing objectives added to match play by a third party that would alter previous strategy and have a cash payout...

My problem is not with these teams, or that these teams agreed to undertake this challenge. It is that this challenge had a dollar amount attached to it.

Edit: I mean I also have a problem with the challenge as well, but I think that stems from the money involved.