[FRCTop25.com] Week 4 Results LIVE tonight!

[Justin Montois]

As we pass the halfway point of the Regional / District season, the Top 25 boasts some impressive teams that have played some great matches. Tune in tonight at 9PM EST at www.new.livestream.com/frctop25 to see how the ranking shake out this week.

Post in this thread any topics you'd like us to discuss or you can send us an email, MikeandJustinITM@gmail.com. Use 'Call In' in the subject line if you'd like to call in and discuss your topic with us LIVE on the air.

We will be recapping the action from this past weekend and have a few other things we're looking forward to discussing.

Help us spread the word on Facebook and we hope to see you tonight.

[Rangel]

Thanks for the show guys. Despite the chat, I really enjoyed it .

[falconmaster]

Thanks for mentioning the ranks down to 30. It was great to hear something positive about us after all the slamming we have been getting. I think I heard you guys say we won the money, its not true we lost, both teams did not get over 200 points. The whole experience has been very educational about human nature. My team and I are analyzing all that went down and learning from it.

[Mike Starke]

Originally Posted by falconmaster

. I think I heard you guys say we won the money, its not true we lost, both teams did not get over 200 points. .

You're absolutely right, my sincerest apologies that I misspoke!

[Mike Starke]

The archive for tonight's show is up at https://www.new.livestream.com/FRCTop25/events/2851752 in case you missed it! Thanks for watching, and thanks for the support!

[peirvine]

Originally Posted by falconmaster

Thanks for mentioning the ranks down to 30. It was great to hear something positive about us after all the slamming we have been getting. I think I heard you guys say we won the money, its not true we lost, both teams did not get over 200 points. The whole experience has been very educational about human nature. My team and I are analyzing all that went down and learning from it.

Who were 26-30? I didn't get a chance to see the webcast...

[Justin Montois]

Originally Posted by peirvine

Who were 26-30? I didn't get a chance to see the webcast...

26. 3683
27. 558
28. 973
29. 3990
30. 842

[BJC]

Great show guys!

I'm flattered that voters chose 33 to be the #4 spot even though we did not deserve it based on our week 4 performance.

Our team prides ourselves on continuous improvement. That said, between weeks 1 and 4 we iterated ourselves right out of our initial winning solution in pursuit of certain other functional objectives. In other words, the robot competing at Great Lakes Bay was the result of calculated risks that did not pan out. You can expect us to return back to our Southfield performance level for future events and (hopefully) exceed that as the season continues.

Cheers, Bryan

[peirvine]

Originally Posted by Justin Montois

26. 3683
27. 558
28. 973
29. 3990
30. 842

Thank you!

[Gregor]

Originally Posted by BJC

Great show guys!

I'm flattered that voters chose 33 to be the #4 spot even though we did not deserve it based on our week 4 performance.

Our team prides ourselves on continuous improvement. That said, between weeks 1 and 4 we iterated ourselves right out of our initial winning solution in pursuit of certain other functional objectives. In other words, the robot competing at Great Lakes Bay was the result of calculated risks that did not pan out. You can expect us to return back to our Southfield performance level for future events and (hopefully) exceed that as the season continues.

Cheers, Bryan

What were some of the changes you made, and what didn't work?

[Abhishek R]

Originally Posted by BJC

Great show guys!

I'm flattered that voters chose 33 to be the #4 spot even though we did not deserve it based on our week 4 performance.

Our team prides ourselves on continuous improvement. That said, between weeks 1 and 4 we iterated ourselves right out of our initial winning solution in pursuit of certain other functional objectives. In other words, the robot competing at Great Lakes Bay was the result of calculated risks that did not pan out. You can expect us to return back to our Southfield performance level for future events and (hopefully) exceed that as the season continues.

Cheers, Bryan

33's innovation keeps inspiring others. I've already seen that loop to hold the ball in show up on now two Texas teams. I'm excited to see what they have in store for the future.

[Tottanka]

can someone just post the top 25 list, for those who can't watch the whole thing?
Thanks

[Rynocorn]

Originally Posted by Tottanka

can someone just post the top 25 list, for those who can't watch the whole thing?
Thanks

Just click the link in any of justin or mikes posts or in the title of there post and it will be found there on their website

[Mr. Lim]

May I ask what percentage of voters are Canadian?

I'm trying to figure out if having 6 Canadian teams in the top 25 (or 8 in the top 30) is a result of the broader FRC community thinking Canada has a strong contingent of robots this year, or is it more so because of overrepresentation of Canadian voters?

I occasionally vote on the FRC 25 when I have the time, and I usually vote for teams I've seen enough of to form an opinion - which for me are predominantly Canadian.

If there are a lot of Canadian voters who do the same as I do, it could put a disproportionate number of them into the top 25.

...not that I really have a problem with this , but it's data I would be interested in if it's available!

[minhnhatbui]

Originally Posted by Justin Montois

26. 3683
27. 558
28. 973
29. 3990
30. 842

3990 in 29th position? This made my day. Thank you, voters!

Originally Posted by Mr. Lim

If there are a lot of Canadian voters who do the same as I do, it could put a disproportionate number of them into the top 25.

I don't see any problem with that, let them come and vote