|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think FIRST should extend autonomous to 30 or more seconds for future games? | |||
| Yes |
|
54 | 28.27% |
| No |
|
123 | 64.40% |
| Don't really care |
|
14 | 7.33% |
| Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Do you think FIRST should extend the autonomous time
It has to be decided on a game-by-game basis. For this year, it wouldn't make sense having much more than 10 seconds. For, say, FIRST Overdrive, I would have liked to see it be a little longer.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Do you think FIRST should extend the autonomous time
You can score 75 in auto this year. Most qualification matches do not peak 100 points. This seems plenty important.
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Do you think FIRST should extend the autonomous time
Simply extending the time period for autonomous as we now know it, as others have already observed, has limited value.
Shouldn't it be stipulated that along with more time, the expectation would be to add more challenging content as well? That certainly seems worthwhile to me. Perhaps the OP can clarify what the poll is intended to ask; otherwise your answer depends more on what you think the question assumes. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|