Potentiometer issues

[Qbot2640]

Originally Posted by Alan Anderson

If you're worried about "variable resistance", then you might not be understanding the proper use of a potentiometer. You're supposed to connect +5 and (-) across the device, and the wiper goes to the Analog Input. 5 volts is always across the pot. The output is a voltage which is proportional to the turning of the shaft.

That make sense, we'll try that - and you're right, I had no idea how to properly connect...where would one find that out without experimentation and exactly what I'm doing now.

For educational purposes - Why is a larger value potentiometer value synonymous with additional noise?

[Alan Anderson]

Originally Posted by Qbot2640

For educational purposes - Why is a larger value potentiometer value synonymous with additional noise?

It's a matter of source impedance. The higher the resistance, the less able it is to overpower any noise being induced on the signal.

[Qbot2640]

Thank you for the much needed lesson...
We are currently picking up the signal from our encoder and multiplying it by 72 to simulate degrees around the circle. The problem we're having is that the break point between 360 and 0 (between 5 volts and 0 volts from the encoder) is very close to the top of our travel, and there were times when we over drove the tilt and surpassed the maximum point on the circle. Then, our autonomous code read the current angle to be something like 3 degrees (rather than 355 degrees) and tried to raise rather than lower the shooter to reach the desired set point. We should have rotated the magnet as soon as we discovered this, but we thought we could handle it by adjusting the limit switch location...hind sight!

Can I install a potentiometer in the manner discussed here without any significant code changes (except perhaps the multiplier and the desired "set point") and read the value just like we're reading the encoder value?

[Alan Anderson]

Originally Posted by Qbot2640

Can I install a potentiometer in the manner discussed here without any significant code changes (except perhaps the multiplier and the desired "set point") and read the value just like we're reading the encoder value?

Yes, it should be that simple. The one difference between the sensors that you need to worry about is that potentiometers typically have physical limits on how far they travel. If you do get a continuous-travel pot, the "dead zone" at the transition from maximum directly to minimum is usually a significant angle. For your purposes, just make sure the pot is rotated so the normal range of travel is not exceeded.