Go to Post How are you supposed to conceptualize without a complete grasp of what your trying to do? - Aren_Hill [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-04-2014, 13:08
sastoller sastoller is offline
Registered User
FRC #2122 (Team Tators)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 145
sastoller is a splendid one to beholdsastoller is a splendid one to beholdsastoller is a splendid one to beholdsastoller is a splendid one to beholdsastoller is a splendid one to beholdsastoller is a splendid one to behold
Re: Record Number of Replays in Elims?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsisk View Post
Not sure if you are referencing Curie 2011 or Vegas 2014 regarding the not warranting a replay, but the interference at Vegas did change the game, the ball was headed straight for the 1717 HP with 1717 waiting for the ball right in front of him. The cameraman knocked the ball back into the field of play and it had to be chased down on the opposite of the field under heavy defense. It could very easily have cost them 15-20 seconds to retrieve the ball vs the couple seconds catching/tossing would take.
The interference at Vegas did not significantly change the outcome of the semifinals match. The margin of victory of the first match was 78 points (203 to 125). This is more than the 60 points of a perfect cycle (and how many perfect cycles have we seen with a catch?). A perfect cycle under heavy defense takes much longer than 15 or 20 seconds, and would still not have been enough to change the outcome of the match. The actions of the cameraman did not significantly impact the outcome of this match.

There was a match at Vegas on Friday, Q-41, where a referee punched a ball that was coming at him. The result of this match was a tie. In this case the referee's actions did have a very significant impact on the outcome of the match, as 15-20 seconds chasing down the ball could have drastically changed the outcome of this match. No replay was given for this match.

I would like to see the head referee and the FTA be more consistent in their decisions of what merits a replay based on outside interference and the significance of it's impact on the outcome of the match.

Last edited by sastoller : 07-04-2014 at 13:10.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:30.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi