There has been a lot of talk about teams entering at multiple events this year but now that the regional season is over we need to look back at the process and see how well it worked.
Both of our feedback forms are posted
here. It's interesting to see that at Dallas where we didn't win the judges seemed to give us overall better scores. We drastically overhauled our presentation for Lone Star and improved that score but regressed in others but we were selected as the Chairman's Award winners.
How did other teams iterate on their awards process? How was the judging different from event to event for your team?
Anyone else have their feedback forms posted for comparison?
I think that this clearly indicates that 2017 will be the year we finally see 3.63 robots per alliance. - Caleb Sykes [more] 
Threaded Mode