Go to Post you must do whats best for the company...not yourself. - Greg Perkins [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: What are your thoughts about the "3 day robots"
3 days robots were a good thing. I want to see the same or more next year. 174 51.33%
3 days robots were a good thing, but I want them to do a little less. 84 24.78%
3 days robots were a bad thing. They could be better with some improvements. 7 2.06%
3 days robots were a bad thing. I think they should leave the game to the teams. 74 21.83%
Voters: 339. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2014, 21:02
cadandcookies's Avatar
cadandcookies cadandcookies is online now
Director of Programs, GOFIRST
AKA: Nick Aarestad
FTC #9205 (The Iron Maidens)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 1,564
cadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking Back: 3 Day Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Siri View Post
Personally, I agree with you--I'm a huge fan of Ri3D. But what non-anecdotal evidence could possibly be offered for either case? It's not like we're taking a census here. Would you be looking for something in particular?
I'm just looking for larger scale or aggregate data-- ideally in a statistically valid form. I don't really expect anyone (either for or against Ri3D/BB) to bring in data, but I think that's the only way to move beyond rhetoric (where the conversation is now).

As for metrics, there are a couple of higher level ways (that don't require new data) to look at-- all of which have their own problems-- rookie retention/overall retention versus prior years (problem: is affected by other factors like quality of game and uncontrollable factors), lower quartile scoring ability (doesn't necessarily mention inspiration or thinking, just competitiveness).

I'd be curious if anyone has an idea of how to analyze the problem while moving away from rhetoric and into more objective analysis (which I realize is difficult and unlikely to actually happen).
__________________

Never assume the motives of others are, to them, less noble than yours are to you. - John Perry Barlow
tumblr | twitter
'Snow Problem CAD Files: 2015 2016
MN FTC Field Manager, FTA, CSA, Emcee
FLL Maybe NXT Year (09-10) -> FRC 2220 (11-14) -> FTC 9205(14-?)/FRC 2667 (15-16)
VEXU UMN (2015-??)
Volunteer since 2011
2013 RCA Winner (North Star Regional) (2220)
2016 Connect Award Winner (North Super Regional and World Championship) (9205)
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:21.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi