Go to Post When we got it tuned to the point where we were (reasonably) confident it wouldn't slam into Dave's ankle, we quit for the evening. - Kevin Watson [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-04-2014, 17:41
Rangel(kf7fdb)'s Avatar
Rangel(kf7fdb) Rangel(kf7fdb) is online now
John Rangel
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 715
Rangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond reputeRangel(kf7fdb) has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Game Manual - Team UPDATE 2014-04-15

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo View Post
We've seen three games with clauses allowing point changes before Championships but no changes so far. I wonder what circumstances would prompt FIRST to change the point values?

In 2012 and 2013, the end games were subject to point adjustments. When would you want to alter those values? If the tele-op scoring was higher than expected and endgame wasn't providing enough of a dramatic swing? If teleop scores were lower than expected and endgame was dominating all of the scores? If endgame was harder than expected and you want to increase its value? If endgame was easier than expected and you want to reduce its value?

In any of those cases, I think the teams that made the right predictions about the way that game will play out have earned the privilege of showing up to champs to play a game that favors their chosen strategies.

I just can't think of a scenario when it would make a lot of sense to change the point values before worlds. I think it would be a good idea to drop that clause out of the 2015 rules.
Part of it was because of mini-bots in 2011. They were basically the decider of many games including Einstein because tube scoring became nearly useless after the second row. I don't see anything wrong with leaving the rule in just in case a scenario like that happened again. Had this rule been in the 2011 manual then minibot scoring would have likely changed or tubes scoring could have changed as well.
__________________
2011-2014 Arizona Regional Winners
2012 Dean's List Winner
2012-2013 Team President
2013 8th Place Robosub Competition
2014-? Mentor


Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-04-2014, 21:47
Nemo's Avatar
Nemo Nemo is offline
Team 967 Mentor
AKA: Dan Niemitalo
FRC #0967 (Iron Lions)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 801
Nemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Game Manual - Team UPDATE 2014-04-15

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangel(kf7fdb) View Post
Part of it was because of mini-bots in 2011. They were basically the decider of many games including Einstein because tube scoring became nearly useless after the second row. I don't see anything wrong with leaving the rule in just in case a scenario like that happened again. Had this rule been in the 2011 manual then minibot scoring would have likely changed or tubes scoring could have changed as well.
Fair enough. I should have remembered that one, along with the IRI scoring change to make the bottom row worth the same as the middle row. That would have been a good change at the Championship.

Maybe if they include that rule again, it will also cause them to discuss the potential problems with scoring values and then fix them before they release the game. We haven't had any issues with diminishing returns on scoring in the three games since 2011.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:44.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi