|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
Added data for each division for worlds.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
Any chance you're going to add in DCMP into there or are you skipping intentionally because the scores were so much higher at those events?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
It is already in there! There is a tab for week 7. Since defense was so much more of a factor at DCMPs, the scores kinda got standardized already
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
Quote:
Whoops... Oh by the way, thanks for providing this! |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
Question because this is the second set of data that only has our results from Mrytle Beach. Why does it not account for our better showing at Orlando in the Curie division data.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
Quote:
Orlando: 23.72 Myrtle Beach: 26.76 |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
Quote:
I see that you're sorting by OPR. Which is understandable. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
Most people look at OPR because DPR isn't quite the best indicator to a teams performance - it relies on alliance strategy even more than OPR. Therefore, for my purposes, I just chose to sort by OPR. Teams can choose to look at other aspects of team data and I encourage you to do so!
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics
So you guys have brought up some regionals that I have missed and I apologize. I will add the following soon:
Lenape Hartford Crossroads Silicon Valley |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|