Einstein 2014

[Ernst]

Originally Posted by electroken

I like the way you think...

I'm totally ok with those predictions. Somebody has to be the first 4th bot to win CMP.

[MamaSpoldi]

Originally Posted by ErvinI

Using predicted standings to figure out who the captains are and then using max OPR to figure out who they are going to pick, this is what I got for Einstein:

Archimedes: 1477, 1625, 175, 2607
Curie: 469, 1718, 230 , 1732
Galileo: 3683, 148, 70, 1730
Newton: 1986, 1114, 3928, 3824

Curie over Archimedes
Newton over Galileo

Curie World Champions

I don't like how the data came out, so I'm just leaving this here for now in case any of these alliances come true. Feel free to bug me if you want the other alliances that formed. There aren't that many surprises in terms of seeding upsets when it comes to OPR.

If that's how the numbers work out then we will just have to accept it.

[I-DOG]

Archimedes
Winners: 2nd Seed *2056, 33, 20, 2158
Finalists: 1st Seed 1477, 1625, 4911, 1816

*Team declined the 1st Seed

Curie
Winners: 5th Seed *1718, 359, 624, 1714
Finalists: 2nd Seed 1241, 118, 11, 3015

*Team declined the 3rd Seed

Galileo
Winners: 1st Seed 67, 148, 1730, 1717
Finalists: 6th Seed 836, 188, 973, 1218

Newton
Winners: 3rd Seed 610, 1678, 330, 1983
Finalists: 1st Seed 1986, 1114, 3284, 1806

Einstein
2013 World Champions: 67, 148, 1730, 1717
Finalists: 2056, 33, 20, 2158

[JohnSchneider]

Originally Posted by I-DOG

Galileo
Winners: 1st Seed 67, 148, 1730, 1717
Finalists: 6th Seed 836, 188, 973, 1218

1717 as a 4th robot?

[Anupam Goli]

Originally Posted by JohnSchneider

1717 as a 4th robot?

1717's 2 ball auto would warrant them 2nd robot status alone...

[dodar]

Originally Posted by Anupam Goli

1717's 2 ball auto would warrant them 2nd robot status alone...

You do realize how many teams have 2 ball autos this year, right?

[dellagd]

Originally Posted by Anupam Goli

1717's 2 ball auto would warrant them 2nd robot status alone...

I think a 2 ball auton isnt going to be that uncommon. Regardless, teams shouldnt have that much trouble picking 3 robots that all can do a high autonomous, hot too.

[Woolly]

Originally Posted by I-DOG

Archimedes
Winners: 2nd Seed *2056, 33, 20, 2158
Finalists: 1st Seed 1477, 1625, 4911, 1816

*Team declined the 1st Seed

Curie
Winners: 5th Seed *1718, 359, 624, 1714
Finalists: 2nd Seed 1241, 118, 11, 3015

*Team declined the 3rd Seed

Galileo
Winners: 1st Seed 67, 148, 1730, 1717
Finalists: 6th Seed 836, 188, 973, 1218

Newton
Winners: 3rd Seed 610, 1678, 330, 1983
Finalists: 1st Seed 1986, 1114, 3284, 1806

Einstein
2013 World Champions: 67, 148, 1730, 1717
Finalists: 2056, 33, 20, 2158

I'm not complaining, but this seems disproportionately Missourian.

[I-DOG]

Originally Posted by JohnSchneider

1717 as a 4th robot?

Stranger things have happened and if 1717's consistency issues come back, they could easily fall even lower. Don't get me wrong, I love 1717 and I think that they have the potential to be a seed captain.

However, scouting hiccups happen, unexpected teams seed high, teams under perform and then explode in the elims, etc. I'm sure no one expected the alliance of 1241, 610, and 1477 to ever happen last year. That's what makes an unpredictable game so unpredictable.

To give another example: People doubted that 217 would be the 24th pick in Newton last year.

Originally Posted by Woolly

I'm not complaining, but this seems disproportionately Missourian.

Especially that Newton 1st seed, right? There are so many of you guys in Newton! I tried to not be disproportionately Texan, Californian, Michiganite, or Canadian. I guess somehow I moved to Missouri in the process...

#stlouisforstlouis #mammothofmissouri #iamtitanium #swatthesehatersoffme #driventoeinstein #firem4hlaser
#rememberthealamo

[RoboAlum]

Since the predicted ranks came out Im gonna revise my predictions:

Archimedes:

1st Seed: 1477,2485,20,900

Curie:

2nd Seed:1241,254,1501,2478

Galileo:

6th Seed: 67,1717,2481,179

Newton:

2nd Seed: 971,1114,610,3147

Einstein:

Curie V Archimedes
Winner Curie

Newton V Galileo
Winner Newton

Curie V Newton
Winner and Champion Curie

[David8696]

Originally Posted by RoboAlum

Since the predicted ranks came out Im gonna revise my predictions:

Archimedes:

1st Seed: 1477,2485,20,900

Curie:

2nd Seed:1241,254,1501,2478

Galileo:

6th Seed: 67,1717,2481,179

Newton:

2nd Seed: 971,1114,610,3147

Einstein:

Curie V Archimedes
Winner Curie

Newton V Galileo
Winner Newton

Curie V Newton
Winner and Champion Curie

I thoroughly approve. Although the Einstein results could be significantly improved......

[brandon.cottrell]

Originally Posted by I-DOG

Einstein
2013 World Champions: 67, 148, 1730, 1717
Finalists: 2056, 33, 20, 2158

If I'm not mistaken the 2013 world champs were 1241, 610 and 1477

[Chris is me]

I don't know where you guys are all getting this idea that 20 is going to be the 16th selection on Archimedes. 20 is a top 5 team in the division, excelling at any role in the game. About the only thing they can't do is a point blank low goal high shot. Barring some kind of catastrophe I don't expect them to escape the first round.

Once EWCPCast airs I'll make predictions based on the bracket generated in the show. The show bracket ignores strength of schedule, carried teams, bad scouting so it may not be the most accurate but this is for fun anyway, right?

[Justin Shelley]

Archimedes
Winners: 2056, 33, 900, 2158

Curie
Winners: 254, 624, 4522, 1714

Galileo
Winners: 148, 3683, 1730, 217

Newton
Winners: 1986, 16, 3284, 111

Einstein
2014 World Champions: 254, 624, 4522, 1714
Finalists: 148, 3683, 1730, 217

[hrench]

Originally Posted by JohnSchneider

1717 as a 4th robot?

iF 1717 doesn't want to be the fourth robot for Galileo, 1108 will be happy to do it. I'm really surprised we're not making anybody's lists. ?