|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?
[quote=Tyler2517;1379327]It was the most strategic game and was a blast to wasimilarhigh levels. Once the bugs were fixed it was going pretty well.[/QUOTE
So everyone has there own opinions but I think if you isolate each game to just its strategic components you can rank them pretty easily. If you were not around for 05 or 07 you really should check them out. Looking only at each game from a strategic level. 1. 2007 - deciding where to score and cool end game. Cool Robot types 2. 2005 - deciding where to score and when. 3. 2013 - cycling climbing fcs 4. 2014 - pre match decided games. DEFENSE. Where to score. ASSISTS. 2 balls would have made game better... 5. 2012 - bridge points. 6. 2010 - how soon people forget how bad week 1 was but it got fixed too. 7. 2008 - different concept but hard to understand score. all matches seemed similar. 8. 2006 - shooting was cool at the time but has been better since. Periods was cool. 9. 2011 - every game played exactly the same. OP end game. 10. 2009 - try to drive. Pin near human player... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|