|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
-More matches: Practice paid off and Increase in Strategic play at team's second events and the District Championship -Unbag Time: Even several rookie teams made significant changes between events and saw great success later on, because of this. *Huge shout-out to 4980*. Iteration is a huge part of engineering The list can go on and on. Just getting teams out to more events means more opportunities to get awards and opportunities to perform well. This can be a great source of motivation and inspiration for some. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Could you imagine Texas teams in 2-3 years if we went districts!!! We have 2 world champs in the last two years. Im scared to think on how good texas would become.
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
I knew Districts worked when FiM did their first championships back in 2009 and HOT was going to the championships with 85 matches under their belt to my teams dozen. I can't wait til New York goes District!
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Correction: 4967 won Highest Rookie Seed and Rookie Inspiration
4917 won Rookie All Star |
|
#20
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
If you play in one event, you get a certain idea of what is required to be successful so you make some improvements to try to achieve the benchmark you saw. Then in your next event you see some teams that blew away anything you saw in your first event. Time to reset the benchmark. Then you make it to the regional championship (I hate when it's called the district championship) and you realize how high the bar really is. Now you really have to figure out how to raise you game. By the time you make it to World Championships, you've already seen the game at such a high level that you're ready for anything. The fact that the district system forces a higher level of competition results in the teams being much more prepared for what they'll see in St. Louis. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
Last edited by Jscout11 : 28-04-2014 at 10:25. |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
Here is a sort of all Einstein apperances prior to this season, I haven't updated it yet with 2014 results. Team # of Division Titles 177 7 217 6 67 5 233 5 25 5 71 4 111 4 254 4 469 4 33 3 60 3 175 3 968 3 987 3 1114 3 16 2 64 2 118 2 144 2 148 2 173 2 294 2 330 2 340 2 494 2 503 2 1126 2 1218 2 2056 2 51 1 53 1 56 1 59 1 65 1 66 1 68 1 75 1 85 1 108 1 115 1 121 1 122 1 125 1 179 1 180 1 190 1 195 1 201 1 207 1 222 1 236 1 245 1 247 1 279 1 292 1 296 1 302 1 303 1 341 1 343 1 348 1 349 1 378 1 435 1 451 1 522 1 548 1 610 1 766 1 781 1 862 1 868 1 910 1 971 1 973 1 1024 1 1038 1 1124 1 1139 1 1241 1 1270 1 1319 1 1388 1 1477 1 1503 1 1507 1 1519 1 1625 1 1640 1 1678 1 1902 1 2016 1 2041 1 2194 1 2753 1 3138 1 3357 1 3476 1 4334 1 |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
I think the rather obvious conclusion that more matches--with the ability to improve between/during each event--makes for more competitive robots is, well, rather obvious. Districts allow teams more matches and more time to work on their robots. If that *doesn't* improve teams, then teams are doing something wrong! |
|
#24
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
(Aging myself here a bit...) Back when "The Dream Team" dominated the Olympics way back when, there was debate about if a team dominating the Olympics was good for basketball. After all of the debate, the consensus was that having the Dream Team would cause the rest of the world to raise their level of play because now they knew what basketball at the highest level was like. In the end, that prediction came true because the USA has since been challenged and beaten - the rest of the world rose to the challenge. I think the same effect happens to teams that compete in FIRST. The better the teams they compete against, the better they themselves will be. I know that we learned a lot from MSC that made us a way better team then we would've been without it. There will always be teams that are happy with where they are. However, there are also a lot of teams that want to be very competitive and want to be the best. If your target of what is "the best" is higher than others targets, then I believe your higher target will naturally make you better. Last edited by Chris Hibner : 28-04-2014 at 11:03. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Here's a thread I created in 2009 to talk about FiM's success that year on Einstein. It should provide some interesting perspective based on the past few years. With more years and other regions, we have plenty more data since then. Additionally, you'll notice that the two factors I broke out specifically at the end have since been adopted outside of the district model.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=77045 Not sure if I agree with your assessment. There were certainly teams that didn't have effective ground loading methods, but almost every team at MAR championship could register a possession from the human player. That's a large part of what led to the creation of the "double exchange" strategy (firing a ball immediately back to the human player after getting a possession), which in turn was very popular this past weekend (including 2590's alliance using it to reach Einstein). Last edited by Lil' Lavery : 28-04-2014 at 11:33. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
I don't think a lot of people remember how averse a majority of the community was to districts until they actually played out so magnificently in Michigan. There was a lot of talk about it "not really being FIRST" and the like. Look at how far we have come!
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
That strategy was a smart way to deal with the limitations of a lot of robots, but the lack of intake especially gave these robots little strategic depth beyond that, unlike the alliances at champs that used this strategy. Last edited by Jscout11 : 28-04-2014 at 13:47. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
The best part about the district model from my perspective, was that we were able to bring upgrade packages throughout the season. Increasing our competitiveness as the season progressed. This was likely helpful to many other teams, which overall increased the competitive nature of the PNW this year.
My biggest problem with districts, is how much school I've missed over the last month. Between 1 day for OSU, 2 for DCMP, and 3 for CMP, it's too much. Especially in the middle of AP study season. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
PNW and NE FIRST both sent a lot of teams to eliminations this year because of the district model and I can't wait to see even more areas adopt it and make the competition at championships that much more intense and fun to watch. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proof that districts work: PNW
Quote:
Quote:
With the change to the district system some of the initial registration, and all of the 3rd event fees go back to the district, so overall in the long run it becomes much more financially viable and sustainable than multiple regional events. Though if the district chooses to rent things like pipe and drape, floor coverings and pay an outside vendor for catering and AV production the long term savings may not materialize or be as significant. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|