Go to Post When I mentor other people in programming... they either get pointers or they don't. - JamesTerm [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #61   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:22
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
Better meaning that in UA, a team whose robot could consistently score higher than all 3 opponent robots combined could win regardless of partners.
So? Why is it necessarily a bad thing to have a game in which it's not possible to build a robot that can outscore three competent opponents on its own?

For consideration, the extreme of this line of thinking is "all games should have chokehold strategies," which is clearly nonsense.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #62   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:22
JohnSchneider's Avatar
JohnSchneider JohnSchneider is offline
Registered User
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 779
JohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKeeg View Post
I wasn't saying that it is a good game because powerhouse teams were punished unreasonably, but rather that less experienced teams were able to have an impact on the results of a match. Often times it was a negative impact, but there was a lot of new teams that could win with their robot...not lack thereof.
What restricted less experienced teams from contributing in UA? There were many ways they could score, and I saw teams who couldn't even shoot disks have more impact than teams who could (Heres your shout out 2789).
Reply With Quote
  #63   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:26
JohnSchneider's Avatar
JohnSchneider JohnSchneider is offline
Registered User
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 779
JohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
So? Why is it necessarily a bad thing to have a game in which it's not possible to build a robot that can outscore three competent opponents on its own?

For consideration, the extreme of this line of thinking is "all games should have chokehold strategies," which is clearly nonsense.
Because seeding is random.

It is somewhat ridiculous that you can build an awesome robot, pay thousands of dollars to attend championships, and then have 3 matches where neither partner is capable of possessing the ball, or really even move effectively. You basically lose those matches before they start.

And of course it's nonsense, Which is why your slippery slope fallacy is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #64   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:29
TheKeeg's Avatar
TheKeeg TheKeeg is offline
Michigan Tech Engineering
AKA: Keegan Harrington
FRC #0068 (Truck Town Thunder)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Ortonville, Michigan
Posts: 77
TheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud of
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
What restricted less experienced teams from contributing in UA? There were many ways they could score, and I saw teams who couldn't even shoot disks have more impact than teams who could (Heres your shout out 2789).
Well the structure of the game forced independence (which is not necessarily a bad thing;I really liked UA). Of course there are cases where rookies scored points or played defense to win a match, but I think it was much more difficult to do. Rookies could and almost always can contribute to the game in some way. I just think AA allowed them to have a real place in a strategy rather than standing alone.
__________________

Keegan Harrington
Truck Town Thunder
2013-2014: Mechanical Design

"Infinity: you empty out all of the coffee and there is still more orange juice"
Reply With Quote
  #65   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:29
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
Because seeding is random.
I was not aware seeding was the primary consideration in game design.

Quote:
It is somewhat ridiculous that you can build an awesome robot, pay thousands of dollars to attend championships, and then have 3 matches where neither partner is capable of possessing the ball, or really even move effectively. You basically lose those matches before they start.
In any real team sport, could you expect to reliably win on your own? If FIRST didn't want FRC to be a team sport, why wouldn't they just get rid of alliances?

Quote:
And of course it's nonsense, Which is why your slippery slope fallacy is ridiculous.
Pointing out the extremes as an attempt to figure out where exactly you'll draw the line is not a fallacy. I am attempting to reconcile our utility functions - to do this, I need to first figure out what yours is.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #66   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:34
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
then have 3 matches where neither partner is capable of possessing the ball
So, there were six robots that couldn't drive 3 feet to push a ball on your division?
Reply With Quote
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:38
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,643
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Until someone can provide some sort of empirical evidence, I don't buy that ranking was substantially worse this year than previous. Nobody has more than anecdotes to support that claim. Strength of schedule has always been wildly variable at championship, and plenty of awesome teams have had mediocre records just about every year.
Reply With Quote
  #68   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:38
JohnSchneider's Avatar
JohnSchneider JohnSchneider is offline
Registered User
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 779
JohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
I was not aware seeding was the primary consideration in game design.
Fair gameplay should be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
In any real team sport, could you expect to reliably win on your own? If FIRST didn't want FRC to be a team sport, why wouldn't they just get rid of alliances?
You think Kobe would be ok playing against the Pacers with a team of 2nd graders?

In "any real team sport" all team members are capable of performing a function on the team. This is not always the case in FRC.
Reply With Quote
  #69   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:44
JohnSchneider's Avatar
JohnSchneider JohnSchneider is offline
Registered User
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 779
JohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11 View Post
So, there were six robots that couldn't drive 3 feet to push a ball on your division?
There were 6 robots who were incapable of controlling their drive trains well enough to, yes. On one occurrence a team actually told us not to inbound to them because they would "Slow us down too much to score any points".
Reply With Quote
  #70   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:47
TheKeeg's Avatar
TheKeeg TheKeeg is offline
Michigan Tech Engineering
AKA: Keegan Harrington
FRC #0068 (Truck Town Thunder)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Ortonville, Michigan
Posts: 77
TheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud of
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
In "any real team sport" all team members are capable of performing a function on the team. This is not always the case in FRC.
It sounds to me like you just want to send all of the teams that do not live up to your standards off to some low level regional where they won't bother the elders. Everybody has matches that are difficult to win due to your partners abilities but that is the thing...everybody has them. The algorythms that create the schedule are not out to get anybody and it is a fact of life that not all schedules will be perfect when there are rookie teams at the event.
__________________

Keegan Harrington
Truck Town Thunder
2013-2014: Mechanical Design

"Infinity: you empty out all of the coffee and there is still more orange juice"
Reply With Quote
  #71   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:49
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
Fair gameplay should be.
Is it "fair gameplay" when a really good robot and two toasters can beat an alliance of three competent robots?

Again, you're appealing to your own definition of "fair," without addressing the core issue here which is that we disagree as to what that word means.


Quote:
You think Kobe would be ok playing against the Pacers with a team of 2nd graders?

In "any real team sport" all team members are capable of performing a function on the team. This is not always the case in FRC.
This is a fundamental issue with the alliance system, and I'm pretty sure FRC are aware of it and think it's a worthy tradeoff for the benefit of having teams cooperate.

I see no reason to compromise game design to ensure that seeding more perfectly reflects the best teams at a regional. As Lil' Lavery mentioned a few posts earlier, I'm not even convinced the problem is that much worse this year than in previous years.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016

Last edited by Oblarg : 28-04-2014 at 16:51.
Reply With Quote
  #72   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:52
JohnSchneider's Avatar
JohnSchneider JohnSchneider is offline
Registered User
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 779
JohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond reputeJohnSchneider has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKeeg View Post
It sounds to me like you just want to send all of the teams that do not live up to your standards off to some low level regional where they won't bother the elders. Everybody has matches that are difficult to win due to your partners abilities but that is the thing...everybody has them. The algorythms that create the schedule are not out to get anybody and it is a fact of life that not all schedules will be perfect when there are rookie teams at the event.
On the contrary, I just believe games should be designed in a way that teams have the ability to excel despite who they get paired with.
Reply With Quote
  #73   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:54
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
On the contrary, I just believe games should be designed in a way that teams have the ability to excel despite who they get paired with.
"The alliance with the single best robot wins" and "the alliance with the best average robot ability wins" are, as I mentioned earlier, fundamentally incompatible goals.

Why do you prefer the former? More pertinently, if FIRST were of the opinion that the former is desirable, why would they have alliances in the first place?
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #74   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:57
TheKeeg's Avatar
TheKeeg TheKeeg is offline
Michigan Tech Engineering
AKA: Keegan Harrington
FRC #0068 (Truck Town Thunder)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Ortonville, Michigan
Posts: 77
TheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud of
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
On the contrary, I just believe games should be designed in a way that teams have the ability to excel despite who they get paired with.
And I believe they could. An assist could be done by two robots that can't even pick up the ball. Defense could be played to wreak havoc on the opposing alliance. Sure it is hard to win with only one scoring robot, but it wasn't impossible. It was also hard to win a match in UA when you are the only moving robot.
__________________

Keegan Harrington
Truck Town Thunder
2013-2014: Mechanical Design

"Infinity: you empty out all of the coffee and there is still more orange juice"
Reply With Quote
  #75   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 18:42
zendergo2's Avatar
zendergo2 zendergo2 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jackson Babb
FRC #0068 (Truck Town Thunder)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Brandon
Posts: 2
zendergo2 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
Because UA and AA are so vastly different in the way that seeding affects outcome.

Many rookie and inexperienced teams still contributed nothing to the alliance in AA, and brought down their partners instead. At least in UA, they weren't holding back partners.

In UA the better robots usually won because there was little to no interaction amongst teammates. A powerhouse could overcome having two inexperienced partners and the better team won.

In AA, better robots could lose because they had two boxes on wheels with them due to random seeding.

You're implying AA is better because powerhouse teams got punished for no reason, and I just can't understand how anyone could support that.
Keep in mind I'm not trying to argue with you, just add to the "glass half full" perspective in some small way by responding to you.

I think the "punishment" of powerhouse teams is a side effect of not letting the box on wheels rely on luck to seed reasonably well. My observations of a fairly limited and perhaps more competitive subset of events were that the best teams were still fairly consistently on the top of the charts. I also noticed that as more teams understood the game and the underlying mechanics, the less they put rookie teams in a corner or on defense. This is taking those people who are normally outcast and finding a productive and integral part for them to play because they are needed.

My and Keegan's team had our fair share of disappointing matches, believe me, but I think that the ranking system of AA might actually be one of the better ones. It pretty much removes the chance of having a powerhouse team on your alliance carrying the match, because the results reflect the combined effort of all alliance members*. The asset you bring to your matches is yourself, but you cannot expect to carry or be carried in your attempt to seed high. Great examples of success from Michigan are 2337 and 1718. They seemed to beat the odds every match, in part due to their ability to find the most effective use for everyone on their alliance. I admire these and other teams who understood the game so well and raised the level of gameplay for all of us.

I think that despite the frustration and pitfalls, some of which were overcome, this game should be an inspiration for the kind of gameplay FIRST needs to offer more of in the future.

*It isn't perfect, but at least it seems to sort the teams out of the top 20% more effectively.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi