Go to Post What Delphi says doesn't matter. What the official Q&A says matters. - Tetraman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Programming
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:49
brennonbrimhall brennonbrimhall is offline
Free Agent
AKA: Brennon Brimhall
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 222
brennonbrimhall is a name known to allbrennonbrimhall is a name known to allbrennonbrimhall is a name known to allbrennonbrimhall is a name known to allbrennonbrimhall is a name known to allbrennonbrimhall is a name known to all
Re: swerve math quiz

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
Define "standard" swerve...
Either http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0537.htm or http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0760.htm.

My definition of a standard swerve drive are four independently controlled modules, such that each can have its own velocity vectors (i.e., independent direction AND magnitude). Anything less than that is not a swerve (or so I've gathered from CD searching and speaking with mentors) -- my understanding is that a crab drive is a derivative of a swerve drive where the vectors must all be parallel (and most always have the same velocity magnitude too, though this is not a mechanical limitation).


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
Unicorn is "4-wheel independent-steering and independent-driven drivetrain, with unlimited rotation of the wheels and sensors, and no gaps in the sensor feedback?" http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...07&postcount=9 Oh, and it was so named by none other than JVN!

You might also call it an idealized swerve drive.
Gotcha. A true, pure swerve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
A more common approach is coaxial swerve, where each side rotates together, and has a limited range of rotation (usually no more than 360 degrees).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
Another approach might be to have all 4 swerve modules rotate together.
I'm a little confused here -- I don't really understand what you're trying to convey with your examples, unless you're just mentioning common implementations of what are commonly referred to as swerve drives.

Assuming you're using continuous potentiometers or some other sort of continuous sensor solution and have independent direction and magnitude control of each module, how is a coaxial swerve drive like 118's Revolution design NOT a unicorn swerve drive?

Per Nate Laverdure's paper (page 2, available here), wouldn't the proper term for what you describe in quote 2 be a crab drive? That's most certainly not a unicorn swerve drive.

EDIT: Nate beat me to his paper.
__________________
Team 20, 2012-2014: 4 blue banners, 5 medals, and 9 team awards.
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 2014-2016: Missionary, Colorado Denver South Mission.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:07.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi