|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Teams with >10 members
Well this is interesting, I am from team 4029, and we just got back from worlds.
This season I was the build captain on a team of 53 registered members (about 40 active). The team has a very interesting dynamic, everyone has a specialty, and the two captains of the team mainly do organizing (My co-captain barely ever touches the robot) and although I am the build captain that mostly means facilitating meetings and choosing the direction of the robot and less brainstorming. Another thing to preface all of this, we are almost 100% student run, all the way down to booking hotels and planning our schedule. I put together a pros and cons list for you guys: PROS:
CONS
Anyways, I hope you all enjoyed that coming from the biggest team in FTC (correct me if I'm wrong). Feel free to ask questions, it does get interesting being 5x the recommended size. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Teams with >10 members
Holy what?! 53?
Obviously I'm not a part of your team, and don't know with certainty what's best for you, but I'd consider splitting. You can still pool together for outreach and fundraising and the like, but there have got to be a lot of your students who are left out of the build process. I've seen ten-person teams who have trouble with people not getting to work on the robot. 53 sounds like a nightmare to me. Again, if it works for you, that's great, but it sounds insane to me. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Teams with >10 members
People join the team knowing what they are getting into, some join some of the local (relatively) smaller teams as well. We started the year with 64, but by our first competition it was down to 53.
We have considered splitting, but part of it is a funding thing, that initial jump to another team costs plenty of money. Also most of the "valuable" members would want to stick together if we split, leaving an A team and B team, which is not something we want. You are right though, not everyone gets robot time. This is something that we have accepted, but there are so many other things to do on the team that it isn't always a problem. There are so many side projects going on that keep us competitive year to year. One example is our autonomous, it was one of the most versatile at worlds and we are now remaking it from the ground up, but in a format that would be adaptable to future competitions. On the management side we have been getting closer to perfecting the large team every year, and this year it was a powerhouse, we were competitive all the way up to Edison semi-finals where we lost because of a broken GB. (We now know the tricks behind not breaking the V2s) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|