|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
Spending more time developing a winning strategy. You can have a robot that looks awesome, but if it doesn't play a winning strategy, then it won't win.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
This especially.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
It takes hours of work and dedication to go far in a season, and years of experience helps too. Remember, winning is not everything.
Last edited by Chris Endres : 04-05-2014 at 20:23. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
You need to design a robot that can play and win at the CHP level.
There are robots that can win a District / Regional, and there are robots that can win a Division / CHP. They are not necessarily the same robots. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
This is very true. Some teams have the muscle and the might (resources and talent) to build the perfect robot to play the game. Some teams don't have that kind of robot capital and have to choose. One thing that I hope will change with a possibly expanding CMP is the addition of robots that can't win at the regional level but know exactly how to plug themselves into an Einstein alliance.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
The title seems to be misleading, please don't get me wrong. A more appropriate would have been something like "Championship winning teams strategy?" or something like like that. Some of the teams that I know measure success by number of students that are inspired into STEM education.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Successful teams in FRC history
I would also say getting your team out there and getting the other teams to recognize you. becoming friends with other teams is a key part to sucess.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|