|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
So from the general conversation, I am guessing that most if not all of the drivetrains had a dropped center. If so, can anyone give me some idea how much to drop the center. On the KITBOT we used I believe all the wheels touched?
![]() |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
*Note other people may have other preferences. This is just the general idea I've gotten from talking to many people about their drivetrain preferences and it seems to be the most commonly accepted one. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Not sure I buy a trend towards swerve or "butterfly" or octocanum or h-drive or anything else on Einstein. Swerve drives aren't new. They've been around for more than a decade in FRC. While they are often overrepresented on Einstein compared to their general FRC population, they're not an overwhelming presence (2 on Einstein seems about historically normal). The largest population of drivetrain in FRC, even among elite competitors, has remained tank drives and I expect that to continue. Even the best teams often favor the advantages in the trade-off of going for a tank drive. What they lose in functionality, they gain back in resources (weight, space, cost, machine time, programming time, driver training time) they can dedicate to other areas. There's a reason you see teams like 118 using tank drives now, instead of the swerve systems they were famous for in the mid/late-2000s.
|
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
-Nick |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
Depending on what wheels you use you can adjust the drop slightly. What I love about Colson wheels is you can trim them down by shaving down the OD of the wheel. Our drivebase this year was originally designed without a drop (doh!!) in a wide configuration and it turned similar to last year's long drivebase with 3/16in drop. We shaved down the other wheels by 1/16in to achieve the 1/8in drop and it works great. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
I think the biggest take away from that list is 8 6 CIM tank drives compared to 4 4 CIM tank drives. 2 to 1 ratio is pretty significant and very new. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
Depends on how you look at the drop. Because we took 1/16th off of both ends and the robot is weighted towards the back there is 1/8in of clearance between one set of wheels and the floor. Another way people look at it is by how much lower the middle wheel is in relation to the other wheels. I've heard it explained both ways. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
I'll be home in a couple days and I will try to grab some pictures of what I call our "Bullet Omnis" They are ridiculously triangular and its hilarious.
|
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Quote:
*For those wondering, I'm going to keep depending it be called Tex Coast Drive for the foreseeable future, so you should probably just get on board. |
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?
Here is a picture of the drivetrain 2363 used this season. It is 6WD drop center live axle.
Last edited by notmattlythgoe : 05-05-2014 at 13:57. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|