|
|
|
 Isn't that what we do here? It seems like no 'controversial' thread is complete until everyone gets a say. - kjohnson [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Isn't that what we do here? It seems like no 'controversial' thread is complete until everyone gets a say. - kjohnson [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#3
06-05-2014, 18:01
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: There is a new FIRST!
FIRST® is a registered trademark of USFIRST. I wonder what FIRST® can do about a proposed House bill that uses its trademark in a similar context to how FIRST® does (and is admittedly somewhat against FIRST®'s values).
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode