|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
We couldn't get inside them, but there were no ramps that we saw. You can BARELY fit 64 teams inside a basketball stadium (Source: FTC North Super Regional). How are you going to fit 128 teams PLUS Jr. FLL (which isn't big but still) in Union Station?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
Quote:
Am I missing something? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Request
Quote:
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
First off, in Michigan FTC is a middle school program, so it's rather unfair to compare the two here. My biggest problem with it is that team numbers change every year, making it feel like every team is a rookie with no history.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
FTC team numbers are permanent like FRC, unless Michigan does it differently.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
You might be thinking of FLL, which recently switched to permanent team numbers.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
No, I am talking about FTC. We must just be different with the changing team numbers, or maybe I just have a horrible memory.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
FTC is in no way an activity for "inferior" students. There are some FTC robots that I would consider to be of higher quality than the majority of FRC robots. Does FRC have bigger and more expensive robots and competitions? Yes. Does FRC do a better job of inspiring kids to do STEM? Yes. Unfortunately, not everybody can afford to participate in FRC. FTC's finals aren't anything like Einstein, but the program itself is much larger. There's two programs because FIRST was not willing to compromise on the "varsity" aspect of FRC, but still wanted to get lots of kids involved in FIRST.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: A Request
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Request
I've seen VEXIQ robots better than the majority of FRC robots.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
On the whole culture change thing:
Minnesota was part of the original FLL pilot program in 1998. We've been growing an FLL volunteer basefor sixteen years now, and we have 600+ teams in the state. Our annual growth is around 20%. It has gotten to the point here where FLL is an expected school activity at the majority of elementary and middle schools in the state. Our FLL qualifiers have volunteers who have been volunteering for more than ten years. FTC is smaller, but we're looking at next year a minimum of doubling our teams next year to around 140. I would be very surprised if in the next three years the amount of sustainable FTC teams eclipses that of our sustainable FRC teams. Why is this important? By introducing kids to FTC and FLL at an early age, and expanding those programs, we help to make robotics an anticipated activity for elementary, middle, and high school students. If you want to actually fix a problem, you don't go to the symptoms, you go to the roots-- in this case, the impressionable young students in elementary, middle, and high school. Like it or not, FTC and FLL are as important to culture change as FRC is. FLL is a large program than FTC and FRC combined, and FTC is going to catch up and pass FRC in terms of students and teams soon. If you personally aren't interested in being involved with FTC or FLL, that's your deal and as intensive as FRC is I don't blame you-- you certainly aren't under any obligation to put even more of your time into it-- but don't diss the programs. They're as essential to the broad picture as FRC is. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Request
314A from VEX IQ World Championships this year may be the best robot I've ever seen.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
It reminds me of 71's 2002 robot.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Request
Any photos or video?
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Request
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|