|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: We built a 6-CIM Kiwi Drive. Criticisms please!
We used a 250-count US Digital encoder on each gearbox. Using this sensor data we had PID control over each velocity component, although I believe we typically only used the P and I terms.
We experimented with a few different IMUs, gyros, and accelerometers in a 4-week-long effort to develop true field-centric control: -- Adafruit 10-DOF IMU (p/n 1604) -- DIYDrones ArduIMU+ V3 (Sparkfun p/n DEV-11055) -- KOP Analog Devices gyro & accelerometer (AndyMark p/n am-2067) In the end, however, we decided to use the KOP gyro only and limit field-centric control to autonomous only. During teleop we used robot-centric control. I didn't really make any scientific comparisons between the actual performances of the 3-CIM prototype and the 6-CIM final design. I really missed a learning opportunity there. Intuitively, doubling the CIM count cut the per-motor current draw in half. In situations where we drive the fully-loaded robot straight into the wall at full voltage, this draw (sometimes called the "pushing match current") reduced from 101 A to 52 A. However, there was also a non-technical reason that we chose to dedicate 6 CIMs to the drive system: in 2012 and 2013 we fielded robots with only 2 CIMs on the drivetrain! As you might have guessed from the 5-sided chassis, with this year's design we wanted to make major changes from our past behavior in as many ways as possible. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|