|
|
|
 *When putting grease on anything* "The bigger the glob the better the job." - TheMagicPenguin [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| *When putting grease on anything* "The bigger the glob the better the job." - TheMagicPenguin [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Coaxial Swerve Derivation with Paired Modules
I agree with others.
Full independant is mechanically easier and it lets your 4 corners exist in isolation from each other. Also, it's trivially heavier as you're not linking power transmission over long distance, so you eliminate all that weight (but do add two motors at .5 lbs each + gearing). |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
