Light Version

[tchescow]

Now there is another version of the Under Control website, for those who use low speed connections, the html light version!

PS: Soon the flash won't be full window - by popular demmand

Comments?

[Jack]

link please?

[Raven_Writer]

Originally posted by Jack
link please?

Link is in his sig (copy and paste the http address into your address).

You should do the flash thing ASAP. Honestly, stop holding it back, please.

[Gope]

You have a bad color scheme

In the flash version you put grey text on a greyish wiremesh background. This isn't "eye friendly."

Other than that, this is incredible. Flash is such a pain, and u did it amazing. Your html sites are also very sleek and well done.

[Yan Wang]

Your site has a nice color scheme. It's simple but does the job effectively. Thereby, you should perhaps take that into consideration when making your site. Often, you'll see sites with 2 versions; high and low bandwidth. But three is pushing it. I see no point in teams having Flash as the basis of their site. A site should be easily accessible for information, not looks. Basically. I'd suggest a medium bandwidth page (no page loads other than pics that are greater than 250kb) which gets the information out and without frames.

[tchescow]

Originally posted by Jack
link please?

www.maristas.org.br/repio/under/
sorry

[tchescow]

Originally posted by Raven_Writer
Link is in his sig (copy and paste the http address into your address).

You should do the flash thing ASAP. Honestly, stop holding it back, please.

Thanks for the help with the link
And sorry but what is ASAP? My english sucks!

[tchescow]

Originally posted by Gope
You have a bad color scheme

In the flash version you put grey text on a greyish wiremesh background. This isn't "eye friendly."

Other than that, this is incredible. Flash is such a pain, and u did it amazing. Your html sites are also very sleek and well done.

Thanks for the complements and suggestions!

[tchescow]

Originally posted by monsieurcoffee
Your site has a nice color scheme. It's simple but does the job effectively. Thereby, you should perhaps take that into consideration when making your site. Often, you'll see sites with 2 versions; high and low bandwidth. But three is pushing it. I see no point in teams having Flash as the basis of their site. A site should be easily accessible for information, not looks. Basically. I'd suggest a medium bandwidth page (no page loads other than pics that are greater than 250kb) which gets the information out and without frames.

I agree with you about the flash stuff. What really matters in a website is its content, altough there's always the image and animation enthusiasts, thereby we've tried to attend all the "tastes", that is also the reason of the "three ways" to visit the website, I don't know the common connections in US, but I believe, most of the users use broadband connections? Correct me if I'm wrong but in Brazil dial up connection is more common, so all the users can visualize the site without any major problems! Thanks for all

[Raven_Writer]

Originally posted by tchescow
Thanks for the help with the link
And sorry but what is ASAP? My english sucks!

ASAP means A(s) S(oon) A(s) P(ossible). May I suggest posting all your stuff in one message, you can quickly get banned for spamming, or rising your post count with needless posts (not sure which one would classify this).

[tchescow]

Originally posted by Raven_Writer
ASAP means A(s) S(oon) A(s) P(ossible). May I suggest posting all your stuff in one message, you can quickly get banned for spamming, or rising your post count with needless posts (not sure which one would classify this).

Thanks for the definition! The new flash website is almost ready, so, it will be online ASAP

[Daniel_H]

Don't worry about him, he's not flooding, he's just excited with the web site

must see!

[Raven_Writer]

Originally posted by tchescow
Thanks for the definition! The new flash website is almost ready, so, it will be online ASAP

hehe. Cool! But I've read somewhere about you having grey-on-grey, bad idea.