|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...idays-06062014
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
If they do go eight divisions I truly hope they don't go back to pit divisions. I liked the floor space but the the seating was never enough and was getting dangerous as the weekend went on as they looked like they were starting to come apart.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
So simple solution to the problem with getting people fed in time: stagger the lunch times between divisions. With the current setup, the could have Archimedes and Curie eating from 11:30 to 12:30 and Newton and Galileo eating from 12:30 to 1:30. This would work very well on Thursday and Friday but not so much on Saturday.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
Quote:
Its not incredibly easy as is but it would be interesting if FIRST had some numbers they could share regarding the St. Louis infrastructure on # of hotel rooms available and booked during the week of champs. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
Is the current wait list a "first come first served" system? I don't think I'd like seeing 200 teams go that just hit the button on a computer fast enough. Teams need to earn their way to the championship in my opinion.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
"Between 6 and 8 divisions?"
7 divisions would be... interesting. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
Don't further expand the great divide that's all this would be doing in terms of FRC. The number of hotel rooms is irrelevant because you have no data on price ranges which is important because FRC students, adults and staff can only pay so much.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
With more teams headed to Champs, the first, easiest change I'd like to see is an expansion of wildcards.
For every regional event, add exactly six teams to the list who weren't already qualified. That means Hall of Fame teams create automatic wildcards anywhere they go. A team that qualifies via awards and winning at the same competition generates a wildcard. Under this system, it is debatable whether a winning alliance backup robot should get an automatic bid, or if they should instead be #7 on the pecking order. The latter allows for a predictable number of Championship bids to be created. Here is a possible pecking order for choosing wildcards: 1-6: RCA, EI, RAS, Winners 1-3 7. Winning Alliance Backup Robot? 8. Finalist Alliance Captain 9. Excellence in Engineering Award winner 10. Finalist Alliance 1st pick 11. Quality Award winner 12. Finalist Alliance 2nd pick 13. Industrial Design Award winner 14. Semifinalist Captain from winning bracket 15. Gracious Professionalism award 16. List continues* *list wouldn't need to be much longer than this for regional events, but it could be longer for district system championship events if they wanted to do anything like that. The points system they use is pretty darned good, though. This could also kick in if there was no rookie to earn the Rookie All-Star Award. Then the next team on the list qualifies as a wildcard. I like having the finalist robots and design award robots high on the list since it would tend to send teams with the best robots to the championship. A system like this would make it seem less impossible to advance from some events. As things are right now, it's incredibly difficult to get into Champs with your robot alone at many (most) regional events if they have two really good teams. In fact, it's even harder if your team has a good enough robot to get picked in the first round. The two good teams pair up and win, and the #16 pick advances along with a rookie team and the two big award winners. Upsets happen, but usually the #1 seed wins those events when two great teams are present. Last edited by Nemo : 06-06-2014 at 04:17 PM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
Quote:
13 matches per team? |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
And "area" is undefined. Rooms within 30 miles, 60 miles, 100?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
Exactly. I'm pretty sure the Four Seasons downtown is quite empty during Championships.
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
The downtown hotels are insanely expensive. It's much cheaper staying by the airport. And with Battlecry going to Memorial Day Weekend it enables me to drive to St. Louis again and if I have a car I can stay further outside of the greater St. Louis area and possibly find even less expensive places to stay.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
On top of rooms being not sensible for an FRC team based on price, a 1 BR King does not hold nearly as much value to an FRC team as a 1BR 2 Queen/Double. There are currently a LOT of rooms close to the venue for the 2015 event that an FRC team wouldn't grab because you can't put more students in it.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frank Answers Fridays - Expanded Championship
Quote:
Frank said the goal was inspiration and recognition. I don't know about the inspiration part, but the more competitive the robots, the better job champs does to gain recognition. I think people would rather watch 233 (who didn't make it to champs this year despite having an awesome robot) than a box of rocks on wheels. Also, being able to get in completely based on luck kind of cheapens the experience, at least to me. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|