Go to Post It looks like you put a robot through a paper shredder. - Madwolvez [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-07-2014, 07:28
cad321 cad321 is online now
Jack of all trades, Master of none
AKA: Brian Wagg
FRC #2386 (Trojans)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 319
cad321 is just really nicecad321 is just really nicecad321 is just really nicecad321 is just really nice
Re: pic: Potential Off Season Drive

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe G. View Post
I would try to avoid this if at all possible. Not only do you loose traction and forward force, but mecanum wheels can do some unpredictable things when they don't contact the ground evenly. This is one of the reasons that it's more common to have the traction wheels at the corners rather than the inside of octocanum/butterfly/nonadrives.

Is there a particular reason that your chassis paneling needs to be so tall, extending above the tops of the 6" wheels? Seems you could save quite a bit of weight by chopping the top few inches off of the frame...

Many similar designs are able to get away with a single stage reduction this way, by gearing to the faster wheel first, then incorporating further reduction into the belt run to the traction wheel.

I'd be concerned with the gap in the middle of the frame in conjunction with the thin, unflanged parallel plate construction. Your frame is four thin parallel plates in the middle, which can bend with each other easily. Either fill in this gap by making the front and rear chassis members one piece, or thicken or put some flanges on the chassis side rails to stiffen them up.
Yes after all of the comments I have seen above (including yours) I will almost certainly be converting the design for a 4in mecanum. More pros than cons (cant see any cons at the moment). Also by only using a single reduction I can probably save a good amount of weight aswell apposed to using the toughbox mini's.

The inner plates actually have two flanges on the bottom allowing the front middle support to be fastened aswell as the sides of the back support. We ran with this almost identical setup this year with a west coast drive and it was extremely durable. Now that I am switching over to the 4in wheels I may lower the top of the plates by an inch or two. The main concern was having the top of the mecanum showing out the top. By having it below it allows for an easier time trying to mount other subsystems to it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnFogarty View Post
Are those 6" wheels?
Yes those are 6in mecanums on it.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:46.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi