|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Finals Question
Quote:
There are 6 ways a robot can get disabled. 1. "ROBOTS whose operation or design is unsafe are not permitted. Violation: FOUL & DISABLED. If the issue is due to design: Re-Inspection." Not this. It wasn't unsafe, and if it was a G3, there would have been fouls on both sides. 2. G4. Placing robots on field. It's not this either. 3. G6. Delayed start of match. I don't think so. 4. G10. Deals only with field elements. 5. G20. Bumper rules. Bumpers were totally fine and in the bumper zone (measured with respect to normal robot orientation). 6. G21. Extend outside field. 2056 did this plenty (with no fouls), but never contacted anything, so no disable. Not this. What's frustrating to me is that my buddy said they never explained who got the first foul and they never explained the second foul at all. Last edited by magnets : 19-07-2014 at 17:40. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Finals Question
The explanation for finals match 1 was "At the beginning of the match, one of the red robots drove onto a blue robot with the intent to inhibit that robot's actions", not quite high speed ramming. From watching the video here: http://youtu.be/gCfHNWajGq4, I can't see anything like that, so it must have been off camera.
Edit: magnets beat me to it but I'll keep my post here for the video link. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Finals Question
2056's drive team could have just stopped moving to avoid further damage. Their robot wasn't necessarily disabled; it just wasn't moving.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Finals Question
Quote:
He could be wrong though. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Finals Question
The reason we believe they were disabled was because both 1114's and 2056's numbers on the scoring screen were in red, which is what happens when they have been disabled (as we saw with team 51 in quarterfinals).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|