Omni Drive Idea

Originally Posted by Jared

I've seen butterfly drives before. I've done some more research, and this is more like 1625 in 2011 with the rotating front piece (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=92650), but with omni wheels. The advantage is when you put down the front wheels (which will be omni wheels), the back omni wheel touches the ground, and you can go forward/back and left/right; you don't have to pick. The front wheels are driven by the left gearbox, and control strafing, and the back omni wheels are driven by the right gearbox, and control normal forward/back. You can't turn in this mode. You don't need a third gearbox to get strafing motion though.

I see what you mean, though how is this better than 1625's Lobster drive then? And furthermore, why do you need to go sideways at all? Does it serve a specific purpose in a general strategic analysis you planned when designing this drive?

[asid61]

Interesting concept. It's kind of a like a butterfly drive, but the back omni wheels are sideways. I think if you design a drivetrain with this in mind it could work fine geometry-wise. You would need to do some creative work in order to keep the size acceptable.

I have a quick question: if only the back omnis are sideways, how cna you go sideways? You wil just turn in place, as the back of the robot will swing sideways while the front stays still or moves forward. Drifting would be super cool with this, but I'm not sure about strafing.

[nicholsjj]

When I read this thread today another thread quickly came back to mind: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...967+drivetrain
This should help give you all some inspiration on a drivetrain concept almost if not identical to yours, except it sound as though you want to mix things up a bit. Someone from 967 is WAY more qualified than myself to tell you how well this drive train can be. Also I am a big fan of what 1730 did with their ball caster/omni-wheel set up and I know an 8" wheel version of that is being talked about as a prototype drivetrain for our team next year.

[Jared]

Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence

I see what you mean, though how is this better than 1625's Lobster drive then? And furthermore, why do you need to go sideways at all? Does it serve a specific purpose in a general strategic analysis you planned when designing this drive?

So far, it's just an idea I had when I was reading the discussion about how team 67 would get stuck in pins. I know lots of teams (118, 1114, 1730) had drop down omni wheels that would let them get out quickly, and I thought it would be a neat idea to mount the drop down omni wheels sideways, and make the driven, so you could drive out of a pin easily. Also, if you're trying to line up to do something, and you're a little bit misaligned, you can easily slide sideways instead of backing up and having to realign.

It's better because when it has articulated down, you get omni directional movement, and possibility for a higher gear ratio when traveling in both directions. It also only has one side with articulating wheels, so it's simpler to build.

With only two single speed gearboxes and one pneumatic actuator, you get two speeds, the ability to turn, or have crab drive (translate in any direction). You pick from low speed normal 6WD driving and high speed crab drive.

Originally Posted by asid61

Interesting concept. It's kind of a like a butterfly drive, but the back omni wheels are sideways. I think if you design a drivetrain with this in mind it could work fine geometry-wise. You would need to do some creative work in order to keep the size acceptable.

I have a quick question: if only the back omnis are sideways, how cna you go sideways? You wil just turn in place, as the back of the robot will swing sideways while the front stays still or moves forward. Drifting would be super cool with this, but I'm not sure about strafing.

The front is the side with the sideways facing omni wheels.

The back will be on omni wheels too, so I'm hoping it will slide sideways.

I think if I move the rotating set of omni wheels to the middle, it will work much better. When they rotate down, the robot will tilt, and the back omni wheels (facing forward) will come into contact with the ground.

[Adrian Clark]

Originally Posted by Jared

The back will be on omni wheels too, so I'm hoping it will slide sideways.

Unfortunately I don't think this will be the case.

I suggest you look at the thread on 967s similar drive, there's a link a few posts back. Their setup is pretty much the same in terms of function. When they strafe they do a turn with the omnis on the ground to counteract the turning force from the sideways wheel. For your drive train you would need to do something similar to properly strafe. Unfortunately, if I understand your design correctly, this is not possible with your drive as the back set of omnis is driven by the same gearbox.

-Adrian

[RyanCahoon]

Originally Posted by Jared

It's better because when it has articulated down, you get omni directional movement, and possibility for a higher gear ratio when traveling in both directions.

I think if I move the rotating set of omni wheels to the middle, it will work much better. When they rotate down, the robot will tilt, and the back omni wheels (facing forward) will come into contact with the ground.

I was playing with a similar drive idea a couple years ago (about the same time as the Iron Lions were doing their drive).

Here's an Inventor animation of the shifting action, and here's a VEX prototype of the drive. Even though it's more severe in the VEX prototype than it would probably have to be on a well-machined FRC bot, the biggest problem I saw with these designs is the amount of tilt necessary to get the traction wheels off of the ground, while still maintaining a decent wheel base in traction mode (these are competing interests).

The Iron Lions' design circumvented this by making the omni wheels part of the support in traction mode, but this means you can't get the dual gear ratios out of the switching system.

It might be interesting to look into utilizing 148's strafing wheel design from this year, where the strafing drive motors also do the actuation of the strafing wheels.

[Bryan1625]

This year we had a single speed 6 CIM drive with 2 traction wheels on the back and 2 omni wheels on the front and T boning was never an issue and if we wanted to T bone someone our front end stuck on them because of the omnis. Its simple cheap and very effective