|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Well, based on the video, the tribot on swerve allows some very advanced maneuvering that could easily get around defense any day. However, defense wise I feel that a tribot would be a push over. Also, it does minimize the amount of space for a shooter, intake, etc. I could see this totally being awesome for a team like 1717 in the 2012 game, Rebound Rumble. With a 3 sided intake and an on top, rotatable shooter I think it would have been even better then it already was (which in my opinion is saying something). This year with a large game piece I could see it being slightly impractical, but in other seasons with smaller game pieces it could work. Teams would also need to focus on weight because an unbalanced weight on a tribot would definitely doom it when hit right. However, super cool video and thanks for sharing!
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHe4MU3x3As I think there is always advantages to different types of drive trains each year. It's just a matter of getting it to work. Your swerve iteration is coming along very well though.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
When a 3 wheel drive robot locks up in a pushing match isn't a large amount of the force on the single back wheel? In which case it could have significantly less pushing power than a 4 wheel swerve driven with the same number of CIMs per wheel. (I realize swerve robots generally don't need to get into pushing matches, just curious as to how it would work)
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Quote:
Why? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Quote:
Well, having a 3 sided bot would expose more area for a defensive bot/offensive bot to hit the bot in the corner to knock a shot off target as a triangle is essentially based off of 3 corners, not 4 corners with "flat space" in between that would do very little when hit. In short, the tribot is more exposed when it comes to being hit effectively. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
True. I was just basing it off of the fact that this one had 3.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Neat design.
Just be careful your shape doesn't fit into one of the game elements like when Rosie stuffed Thrust into the goal in 2010. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Just remember. More 3 wheel swerve robots have won worlds than mechanum.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Because that means a lot.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
IMO, a well-designed swerve drive will beat a well-designed mecanum drive. However, mecanum wheels have only been widely available for a few years in the FIRST community, so you have to give them some time.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
AndyMark first introduced their mecanum wheels in 2006, iirc. It's been quite a bit longer than a "few years" at this point. Granted, the first robot with steered wheel modules to win a championship was 67 in 2005, iirc.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Stang 03? (I don't recall)
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Tribot swerve
Quote:
That's the first swerve I can think of that won it all. Can any old-timers go further back with a winner? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|