Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether
@jhersh: (if you are following this thread) would there be any advantage, tolerance-wise, to change the sample size to an even multiple of 4 (say 12 or 8) so that the averaging would always take place over an integer number of cycles?
|
It depends on the decoding that you have selected. If you select 1x, you have effectively chosen to always average a full cycle, thus averaging out phase noise, If choosing 2x, then multiples of 2 is advised, and if choosing 4x, multiples of 4 is advised (at least if phase noise is something you would like to eliminate, but its a trade-off). I can't imagine a scenario where selecting 4x and 63 samples averaged is better than 64 averaged. I'd love to hear it if you have thought of one.
If your robot can't play at least two matches on one battery, your mechanical design and/or driver strategy needs some rethinking. - Al Skierkiewicz [more] 
21-08-2014, 17:29
Threaded Mode