|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
Just looked at it. It looks pretty awesome, I might give it a try.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
RobotBase.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
To start this year, we used Simple Template, but in the off season, and during the WVROX event, we used Command Based. Having a very small programming background, I thought the transition would be difficult, but it was a lot easier than I though. Moreover, there is a tool called RobotBuilder which makes programming in command based a lot easier, and very quick. It works really well, and it is easy to work with, and teach to others.
This playlist of videos really helped me get started. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...wtlgnvhGObeKzp |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
Personally my background is in game development and thusly I am familiar... Very familiar with the game loop. So for me I find comfort in using IterativeBot. It is flexible in my opinion and I find it easy to implement event-based code and concurrency in some ways. Done right it is not spaghetti code at all.
IterativeBot is my choice. Last edited by MatthewC529 : 19-08-2014 at 05:40. Reason: horrific spelling mistakes... phone keyboard |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
Up until 2013 we used Iterative Robot. In 2013 we switched to Command Based. I don't envision us ever going back. It has encouraged OOP and it has been easy for the newer students to grasp. We are considering using RobotBuilder for 2015 because most of our students have very little OOP and we don't want them to be bogged down in writing classes and creating umpteen million files.
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
We have been using SimpleRobot base class since 2009 when C++ and the cRIO became available. Because it gives us full control and flexibility in how we handle the robot operations. We implement an architecture similar to the CommandBase but of our own design.
We have classes representing the main robot systems which define an interface to: [1] support the various tasks that will be requested by the operator and [2] provide any information that will be needed by other classes, as well as [3] a service function which is called each time through the main loop of teleop and autonomous to perform multi-step operations. [Note that none of the interface functions are allowed to perform operations which take significant processing time; they simply set a flag to start an operation or turn on a mode and return.] Our TeleOp and Autonomous functions are basically loops which maintain the loop time (required for PID loops and other control systems) and make use of the interface defined by each class to facilitate the operation required... either based on an operator request (like pushing a button on the joystick) or based on the steps defined for the currently selected autonomous mode. Reusing the same class interface functions to perform operations in both modes allows our autonomous to come together very quickly and reliably after the testing is done for teleop. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
Would someone please explain the difference between a CommandBased robot and an IterativeRobot?
We went to java in 2012 and started with the RobotBuilder tool. It generated a code skeleton derived from IterativeRobot. The IterativeRobot class is contained in sunspotfrcsdk\lib\wpilibj.src\edu\wpi\first\wpilib j. I have not been able to find a CommandBased class in the wpilib. The IterativeRobot is "command based" in the sense that on every iteration of the control loop, it executes any active commands. I'm not sure how a CommandBased robot would be any different. As for multi-threading, we can get into a theoretical discussion on the merits of multi-threading on a single CPU platform. In general, I prefer the explicit control of keeping things single threaded and using the setInterruptible or cancel methods if I need to preempt a running command. But this would be a discussion for a separate thread (so to speak). |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What base class do you use when programming?
Thank you!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|