|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: blog; Motor Controller Options for 2015
Quote:
Quoting the 2014 rules, NO exception for Velcro, any team who used it violated the modifying motor controllers rule. I wonder if we should check every robot, and overturn matches from this past season? 4.9.11 R64 The Driver Station software, cRIO, Power Distribution Board, Digital Sidecars, Analog Breakouts, Solenoid Breakouts, RSL, 120A breaker, motor controllers, relay modules, Wireless Bridge, 12VDC-5VDC converter, and batteries shall not be tampered with, modified, or adjusted in any way (tampering includes drilling, cutting, machining, gluing, rewiring, disassembling, etc.), with the following exceptions: Please note that the Driver Station application is a separate application from the Dashboard. The Driver Station software may not be modified, while teams are expected to customize their Dashboard code. A. User programmable code in the cRIO may be customized. B. DIP switches on the cRIO may be set (applies to cRIO-FRC only). C. Motor controllers may be calibrated as described in owner's manuals. D. Fans may be attached to motor controllers and may be powered from the power input terminals. E. If powering the compressor, the fuse on a Spike H-Bridge Relay may be replaced with a 20A Snap-Action circuit breaker. F. Wires, cables, and signal lines may be connected via the standard connection points provided on the devices. G. Fasteners may be used to attach the device to the OPERATOR CONSOLE or ROBOT. H. Labeling may be applied to indicate device purpose, connectivity, functional performance, etc. I. Brake/Coast jumpers on motor controllers may be changed from their default location. J. Limit switch jumpers may be removed from a Jaguar motor controller and a custom limit switch circuit may be page 63 / 93 substituted. K. If CAN-bus functionality is used, the Jaguar firmware must be updated as required by FIRST (see Rule R67-D). L. Devices may be repaired, provided the performance and specifications of the device after the repair are identical to those before the repair. Again, im saying that it should be left to the Q&A, and that lawyering rules to this point isnt what FIRST is about, and as I said in my first post in this thread Quote:
Come on guys, use some common sense, If adding fans is legal for the purposes of cooling, do you really think first wouldn't allow thermal paste for the same reason? Last edited by donkehote : 27-08-2014 at 14:57. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|