|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
We used 6-CIM ball shifters (with 2 CIMS and 1 MiniCIM each) on our robot this year. We had no problems with breakers when driving in low gear. There was one occasion that the main breaker was tripped during a hard collision in high gear that could have been attributed to a current spike (or just the force of the collision, we're not sure), but beyond that we had no issues that I'm aware of.
I'm hoping the current monitoring capabilities of the new PD board next year will make it really easy to manage current draw and maybe even allow us to program automatic down-shifting when current draw gets too high. Last edited by cbale2000 : 12-09-2014 at 18:46. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
We had 6 cim single speed at 11 fps and were traction limited with versa wheels. Never tripped any breaker.
Just my opinion, but for the short duration of FRC matches, the low gears on 3 CIM gearboxes have way too high of reduction for robot movement (if the goal is preventing a breaker from tripping). However, if that slow speed is part of the design strategy of the game, that is a different story. Those breakers can take some heat, let them get a little toasty, especially since FRC is held during the winter. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
20 used a shifting 4-CIM, 2-MiniCIM drive geared for about 6 and 16 ft/s in 2014.
We loved it's performance for most of the season. The only issues we had were when our driver forgot to switch into low gear when we were playing defense in our second qualification match at our first regional. We ended up tripping our breaker that match. The gearboxes themselves took a lot of damage as well throughout the season, but that was because our driver drove the robot like he stole it. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
I'm really excited for the new current sensing ability we'll have next year. It will let us automatically shift of we see too high of current.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
While our 5fps was definitely too slow to play the whole match in, there were numerous times (especially in the defense heavy game) that you just needed to knuckle down and bulldoze your way through a pileup. Our robot used 3" Colson wheels, had the bumpers at the lowest point, and had a center of gravity roughly 5" from the floor. We could push nearly everyone, and many tank robots saw themselves skidding sideways by us. We did not have a traction problem at that torque either, and our used wheels had little measurable diameter difference to new ones, to the naked eye. Also, on the topic of generic shifting; Being able to change gears gives you the ability to have a high upper stage (like 16+). Many people had 18fps upper stages or more. If you had a single speed gearbox, I think most people would agree (game dependent, but for 2014 in this) that having only a 18fps gear would not have been a good idea. But certainly most people who had 18fps high gear shifters would agree that it was a great gear knowing you could summon the torque when you needed it. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
This past year we had a 4 cim ,2 minicim vexpro ballshifter west coast drive and we were geared 18 high and 12 low fps we had absolutely no problems with popping breakers. We also had no problems with pushing in high gear although our engineers warned against. Our center of gravity was within 5 inches of the floor . The only thing that reached above 18 inches on our robot was the superlight floor intake and catapult in a nonshot position.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
1687 ran 6 CIMs single speed last year, at 14.5 fps, riding on colsons with a linear tread pattern, playing some real tough defense all year long. At our first event, we tripped the breaker once in our final match, at our second, a couple more times. After that, we looked for ways to eliminate breaker trips for our offseason events. Retrofit shifters were designed, but for various reasons, couldn't be manufactured in time. Instead, we made several minor mechanical, electrical, and software tweaks to reduce current draw:
Did not trip the breaker after this. However, we do plan to use shifters in the future, or gear lower if the game does not call for the speeds we geared for this season. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
That wasn't an option for us because our gear box was constructed single stage and already pushing geometric limits for that configuration, our robot was not set up to accept a COTS single speed gearbox, and manufacturing our own wasn't an option for the same reasons as for shifters. That's the quick solution though!
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
4159 used an amazing 6 CIM. Low of 7, high of around 17. The motors got hot during violent matches, and we tripped the breaker when we tried to push in high gear. Our low gear had an amazing amount of torque, we were able to 2-3 robots at a time no problem.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
I suppose there probably isn't a huge difference between 4 and 6 brakes, so it doesn't matter I guess |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
There are some interesting ideas here for dealing with main breaker trips.
I think the best solution is to gear more conservatively and enjoy the extra acceleration. For short distances, slower is faster. The last two years we have run a 6 CIM single speed drive geared for around 11-12 fps, and have never tripped the main breaker. We have used a spreadsheet to help optimize our gear ratio, and this speed seems to be a sweet spot for single speed drives. It provides great acceleration, and the current demands are low enough not to trip the main breaker. Most of the teams I have talked to about breaker problems were geared higher than 12 fps. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|