Go to Post you don't need a fancy workshop to build a good robot, just determined people. - pacoliketaco [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Electrical
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2014, 14:50
Kevin Sheridan's Avatar
Kevin Sheridan Kevin Sheridan is offline
Registered User
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 57
Kevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sheridan has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Joe,
As far as I know, mercury contacts have never been legal on FRC robots even when slip rings were allowed due the the hazards.
These type of connectors were explicitly allowed in 2006
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2014, 14:53
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanelss View Post
well our design not only has a cim rotating with it but also a servo(we are doing a 2 speed shifting swerve, or at least attempting to) so we need some kind of slip ring with 5 channels 2 of which needs to be 40A for the cim. i mean we could just stick wires through the center as people have pointed out but we don't want to have to deal with all the issues related to untangling the wires.
Perhaps you may want to consider changing your mechanical design then. You can still have 2-speed swerve modules without having the CIM or the servo rotate with the module, and thus avoid the slip ring problem all together (along with other benefits). Look at how many previous teams have implemented co-axial swerve modules (1717, 148 in 2008, 973's "emperor swerve", 118 in 2007, etc.).
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2014, 15:06
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Regarding Mercotac "slip rings":

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Ross View Post
Per Q/A, they were legal in 2006, 2009, and 2011, and illegal in 2010. The reason for them being illegal in 2010 was not because of mercury, but because any type of slip ring was not legal in 2010. There have been no relevant Q/As since 2011.
They passed inspection in 2008 without any concerns being communicated to our team by any inspectors, and even contributed to the TechnoKats' being awarded the Industrial Design Award at the Boilermaker Regional.

I rarely disagree with Al, but in this case I think his objection is too strong. In my opinion, the hazard of contained mercury-wetted contacts is akin to the hazard of sealed lead-acid batteries. Of course, it's his opinion that counts when determining legality of components, not mine.
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2014, 15:42
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,792
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Kevin,
I think the GDC changed their mind on that issue later in the season. Alan, I am not aware of the Technokats using those.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2014, 16:34
RyanShoff RyanShoff is offline
Registered User
FRC #4143 (Mars Wars)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Metamora, IL
Posts: 147
RyanShoff is a splendid one to beholdRyanShoff is a splendid one to beholdRyanShoff is a splendid one to beholdRyanShoff is a splendid one to beholdRyanShoff is a splendid one to beholdRyanShoff is a splendid one to beholdRyanShoff is a splendid one to behold
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

We used the Mercotac slip rings all season without issue, including long practice sessions with CIM motors getting extremely hot. We first saw them on Bombsquad's 2013 bot. I saw them on Bombsquad's 2014 bot at the St Louis offseason event, and I saw them on Pwnage's bot at the Rockford offseason event.

We included a mercury cleanup kit in our safety kit. But I see practically no risk of it being released, even in the event of severe mechanical damage.

I was under the impression that mercury was not disallowed by the FRC rules. FTC rules however have specifically disallowed mercury for a number of years (in the same rule as lead is disallowed).
__________________
Ryan Shoff
4143 Mars/Wars
CheapGears.com
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-09-2014, 16:08
Kevin Ainsworth's Avatar
Kevin Ainsworth Kevin Ainsworth is offline
Registered User
FRC #2451 (Pwnage)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 75
Kevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud of
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

For reference, we did not use the Mercotac slip rings during the season but did test them post season. I also contacted Mercotac years ago and came to the conclusion that we would be running them above their specifications. Mercotac has multichannel units and we could have run multiple circuits in parallel but those get big, heavy and expensive. Ultimately we read the rules to say mercury was not legal and didn't want to hinge a design on that risk. Once we found that Bomb Squad ran the 230's all season with no issues we decided to test them ourselves post season. If First specifically disallows the Mercotac slip rings and lifted the COTS slip ring rule we feel that we have a good alternative in the two designs we've posted on CD. These could be 3d printed by the teams and assembled or if Andy has his ears on... There are also windmill slip rings on Ebay that we have evaluated and would handle the current no problem but they are big and heavy.
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 00:44
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

I had a look at the documentation for the Mercotac slip rings, and judging by the external design and description, I suspect they have very little mercury inside. Given how catastrophically mercury corrodes aluminum (like the housings), they're presumably designed to resist that failure mode—and the simplest way to do that would be to use just enough mercury to wet two closely spaced parallel plates with concentric traces, and then fill the housing with an insulating oil. (The aluminum housings are anodized, which helps, but likely not enough.) The amount of mercury needed to go around the circumferential contact would likely be on the order of microlitres. Judging by voltage ratings on the larger ones (maybe the small ones don't have oil?), that seems like a plausible method of construction.

If that's the case (and contact with their applications engineers ought to confirm/repudiate it), then we're probably looking at a level of hazard comparable to lead in batteries and soldered components, or hexavalent chromium and cadmium on plated components. While not ideal, there hasn't been a blanket prohibition on other components that contain metals that exhibit toxicity when ingested, and with form factors that permit accidental exposure to the metal.

As for the implications of a spill, I think that would depend a lot on how much information was immediately available about the quantity and toxicity of the substances released, and the stringency of the applicable regulations (as interpreted by the people in charge). If cleanup is necessary, it could be a fairly onerous process requiring external assistance.


As for the contact ratings, check with Mercotac's applications engineers if they are willing to publicly provide duration vs. current ratings, because typically, the failure mode is due to temperature rise. If they compare favourably to the trip performance of the circuit breakers, they may be usable for brief periods in excess of their constant current rating. Similarly, if they can provide ratings that presuppose a reduction in the expected life of the device, but won't cause catastrophic failure, perhaps you could get away with more current. In any of the above circumstances, you'd want an engineer's input to have documentation for the inspectors as to why the figures in the published datasheet are not applicable.

Last edited by Tristan Lall : 26-09-2014 at 00:46.
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 07:52
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,792
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Tristan,
You must have missed my earlier post. I did check with Mercotac engineering, earlier this year. Their response was that mercury spills were a reality when the maximum current or the mechanical specifications (specifically misalignment of the two rotating bodies and excessive vibration) are exceeded. There is a difference between "mercury wetted contacts" and using mercury as a contact. These fit into the latter category. For more info please refer to their literature... http://www.mercotac.com/html/literature.html
All of these documents discuss the need to correctly dispose (must be recycled) of these contacts due to the mercury they contain. In almost every paragraph of the two application sheets, connector failure is mentioned as a danger. In the case of a mercury spills on an FRC field does the amount or cleanup procedure really matter? Any is too much!
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 08:28
Paul Copioli's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero Woodie Flowers Award
Paul Copioli Paul Copioli is offline
President, VEX Robotics, Inc.
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 1,391
Paul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Tristan,
You must have missed my earlier post. I did check with Mercotac engineering, earlier this year. Their response was that mercury spills were a reality when the maximum current or the mechanical specifications (specifically misalignment of the two rotating bodies and excessive vibration) are exceeded. There is a difference between "mercury wetted contacts" and using mercury as a contact. These fit into the latter category. For more info please refer to their literature... http://www.mercotac.com/html/literature.html
All of these documents discuss the need to correctly dispose (must be recycled) of these contacts due to the mercury they contain. In almost every paragraph of the two application sheets, connector failure is mentioned as a danger. In the case of a mercury spills on an FRC field does the amount or cleanup procedure really matter? Any is too much!

Al,

I think the underlying theme of this thread is that the FRC rules have been unclear, at best. It looks like your opinion is clear so please help reduce an obvious Q & A question and use your influence to get the 2015 FRC rules to be clear on this issue.

Paul
__________________
In full disclosure I am the President of VEX Robotics, a division of Innovation First International.
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 08:44
Gdeaver Gdeaver is offline
Registered User
FRC #1640
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: West Chester, Pa.
Posts: 1,367
Gdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

In today's regulator environment, Mercury should be avoided period. All of the products that I install have had the mercury removed for a couple years now. My company would not purchase and install any product containing mercury. We go to great lengths to identify products that are removed and replaced that contain mercury. After, removal they are sent to a approved recycler. One must be "compliant". After, the above statement I can't help thinking about the amalgam fillings in my mouth and I made tuna fish salad this week. Ate 4 sandwiches. How can I still be alive?
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 09:49
Rosiebotboss's Avatar
Rosiebotboss Rosiebotboss is offline
2015-16 Divisional LRI - Archimedes
AKA: Dana P. Henry
FRC #0839 (Rosie Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Agawam, MA
Posts: 854
Rosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Rosiebotboss
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

I emailed the EH&S gurus at my place of business, UTAS, a division of UTC, and they sent me these two links: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/exposure.htm
http://www.epa.gov/mercury/schools.htm

We go through great pains to make sure mercury is NOT in any of the equipment we make for NASA and being used for life support on ISS.

I did take a look at them, I didn't read everything, but ANY product containing mercury being used in FIRST should not be deemed legal. IMHO.
__________________
Co-Founder/Mentor FRC Team 839 / JrFLL Team 137/Rosie Robotics/Agawam HS
Winner NEF District WPI 2016
Regional CA-08 Boston, 12 WPI, Eng'g Excellence, 12-15 UL Safety, 15 Motorola Quality
KPCB Entrepreneurship 04, 05, 06, 07, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16
Rookie All Star and Top Rookie Seed 2002
Paul Harris Fellow, CMP Inspector 05-16, Head LRI NE FIRST JTB 1944-2008 "What did you do with your dash?"
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 11:22
Unsung FIRST Hero
Karthik Karthik is offline
VEX Robotics GDC Chairman
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Karthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Copioli View Post
I think the underlying theme of this thread is that the FRC rules have been unclear, at best. It looks like your opinion is clear so please help reduce an obvious Q & A question and use your influence to get the 2015 FRC rules to be clear on this issue.
Agreed about the ambiguity. Here's what I've gathered from this thread.

1. The GDC never ruled about these slip rings in 2014, either via Q&A or manual.
2. Some LRI's, who have final authority at the events, have come out and said these slip rings are illegal in this thread.
3. Other LRI's (or RI's) have ruled these slip rings to be legal, as seen by the teams who were allowed to use them throughout the 2014 season.

This is not a good combination, especially when there are safety concerns about a part. There needs to be a uniform ruling on this going forward. We can't have a situation where a key robot part's legality is determined by which Robot Inspector sees it. This leads to a situation where teams who err on the side of safety end and don't use a risky part, end up giving up a competitive advantage to the team who takes the risk and decides to use the part.
__________________
:: Karthik Kanagasabapathy ::
"Enthusiasm is one of the most powerful engines of success. When you do a thing, do it with all your might. Put your whole soul into it. Stamp it with your own personality. Be active, be energetic, be enthusiastic and faithful and you will accomplish your object. Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm" -- R.W. Emerson
My TEDx Talk - The Subtle Secrets of Success
Full disclosure: I work for IFI and VEX Robotics, and am the Chairman of the VEX Robotics and VEX IQ Game Design Committees
.
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 12:06
Michael Hill's Avatar
Michael Hill Michael Hill is online now
Registered User
FRC #3138 (Innovators Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,576
Michael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karthik View Post
Agreed about the ambiguity. Here's what I've gathered from this thread.

1. The GDC never ruled about these slip rings in 2014, either via Q&A or manual.
2. Some LRI's, who have final authority at the events, have come out and said these slip rings are illegal in this thread.
3. Other LRI's (or RI's) have ruled these slip rings to be legal, as seen by the teams who were allowed to use them throughout the 2014 season.

This is not a good combination, especially when there are safety concerns about a part. There needs to be a uniform ruling on this going forward. We can't have a situation where a key robot part's legality is determined by which Robot Inspector sees it. This leads to a situation where teams who err on the side of safety end and don't use a risky part, end up giving up a competitive advantage to the team who takes the risk and decides to use the part.
Part of the issue is that teams may not necessarily disclose the use of them to inspectors.
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 12:13
BigJ BigJ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Josh P.
FRC #1675 (Ultimate Protection Squad)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 947
BigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Hill View Post
Part of the issue is that teams may not necessarily disclose the use of them to inspectors.
Then they are cheating (if they are knowingly breaking the rules)?

Like a lot of things, we already use the honor system on so many things like Bag and Tag, I'm not really sure what you could propose to enforce "disclosure" besides what they write on the BOM and tell the inspector about.
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2014, 12:17
Michael Hill's Avatar
Michael Hill Michael Hill is online now
Registered User
FRC #3138 (Innovators Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,576
Michael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Looking for slip rings and distributors

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJ View Post
Then they are cheating (if they are knowingly breaking the rules)?

Like a lot of things, we already use the honor system on so many things like Bag and Tag, I'm not really sure what you could propose to enforce "disclosure" besides what they write on the BOM and tell the inspector about.
I think "cheating" is a bit of a strong term, in terms of how you apply it. Since these were specifically allowed in previous years, they may not even know they aren't allowed. This is compounded when an LRI acknowledges a team's use of it and passed them.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:32.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi