|
|
|
 I wanted my team to be rewarded for something they do, not because they do it for the award. - MikePres [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think 8 MINI-CIMS allowed would be a good idea? | |||
| Yes, I'ld love to see what people come up with using 8 MINI-CIMS. |
  
|
46 | 41.07% |
| No, I like the motor rules the way they are! |
  
|
66 | 58.93% |
| Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
#24
26-09-2014, 15:28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 8 MINI-CIM SWERVE
Why does the number of motors need to be divisible by 4?
These types of drive are already very common. I think there's more room for creativity when you are forced to distribute 6 motors evenly, or use 3/4 motors more efficiently. And Z3 symmetry presents another challenge compared to Z4, since there are no proper subgroups. Also 8 MiniCIMs would leave no room for additional 40A circuits, which wouldn't be fantastic if we need to do any heavy-lifting outside the drivetrain. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode