Go to Post Many people here in the CD fora know 'someone' on the inside. They aren't out there somewhere, they are here among us and they won't give an inch regarding the clues. It's very cool. - JaneYoung [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Do you think 8 MINI-CIMS allowed would be a good idea?
Yes, I'ld love to see what people come up with using 8 MINI-CIMS. 46 41.07%
No, I like the motor rules the way they are! 66 58.93%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2014, 12:42
Oblarg Oblarg is online now
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 8 MINI-CIM SWERVE

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
Just because the advantage looks relatively small does not mean it doesn't have major impacts on gameplay. Do a few comparisons of speed vs distance while accelerating and it easy to see that 'mere' 20-30% quickly converts into much higher energy impacts since the energy imparted is proportional to the square of the velocity. These will inevitably occur more often during gamely since they don't require much room for the acceleration.

The advantage then becomes "find the robot who can't do much on offense and which has 6cims, then tell them to go push the other robots around. If they hit the opponents enough, maybe the opponents will just stop working and then we can win".
Or, in more legitimate terms, if you hit them enough they will find it hard to position themselves to accomplish game tasks.

I think it is unfair to characterize tough defense as "hitting people with the hopes their robot breaks." We played defense a lot this past year, and our goal in robot-robot contact was never to cause damage. Good defense is about being in the right place at the right time and knowing how to interact with the robot you're trying to defend against, not simply hitting them as hard as possible. Having additional motors definitely helps with this, both by allowing you to push for longer when needed without tripping a breaker (especially if your opponent cannot do the same), and by allowing you to get to where you need to be faster (and, as a lot of defense is stop-and-go and rapidly-changing, acceleration is critically important for this).
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi