|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think 8 MINI-CIMS allowed would be a good idea? | |||
| Yes, I'ld love to see what people come up with using 8 MINI-CIMS. |
|
46 | 41.07% |
| No, I like the motor rules the way they are! |
|
66 | 58.93% |
| Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 8 MINI-CIM SWERVE
Out of curiosity, would it work if you were to have 4 modules, 2 with 1 cim and 2 with 2 cims (so you have a total of 6 cims), and set it up so that the 2 with 2 cims are diagonal to each other and the one cim modules are also diagonal to each other. That way you would have the power of 6 cims without messing up your movement by having one side of your robot more powerful than the other.
(I have little experience with swerve, so please correct me if this idea is flawed) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|