|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Here is a tip for everyone in this thread who are popping their main breakers or looking to run 6 CIMs and gear fast:
1. Use lower CoF wheels. 2. Build lighter Put down the Roughtop tread in favor of something like the VersaWheel DT or a Colson wheel. Consider constraining yourself to 100lbs instead of 120lbs. There is a reason that a team like 1625 could gear a single speed 12:64 (~17.3 fps free for those of you keeping track at home) and still T-bone like a monster this year. Lower CoF wheels and lighter weight mean pulling less current when accelerating and at stall. Cheers, Bryan |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
This isn't strictly correct; a stalled motor will pull the same current regardless of the CoF of the wheels. Rather, lower CoF wheels make it harder to stall the motor in the first place.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
4476 ran a 6 CIM at a 13-14 ft/s theoretical. We never popped a breaker, and I suspect it was a combo of lower friction wheels, and we put a couple of breakers on the PD board for the drive CIMS at 30A instead of 40A. The idea being that the PD breaker would trip before the main breaker would. I'm not really sure which made a difference as both were implemented prior to testing to make sure we never blew the main breaker, but it makes sense to me that both would have had a significant factor in preventing main breaker trips. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Experience With 6 Cim Drive train
Quote:
When I recommend decreasing wheel CoF and weight it is because this combination is decreasing the normal force on the robot's wheels. When you decrease the force resisting the wheel rotation such that it is less than the force attempting to turn the wheel at drivetrain stall then you are what people refer to as traction limited, meaning the drivetrain's wheels will lose traction and spin in place rather than stopping while the motors continue to try to turn. Quote:
I do want to clarify something though. Popping the main breaker is temperature based and the cumulative result of robot actions over the course of the match. Quickly accelerating from standstill and forward / reverse slams are normal robot actions that pull large amounts of current and cumulatively heat the main breaker. This is where lower CoF wheels can provide small cumulative temperature gains (the wheel CoF determines how easily the wheel spins in place during take-off acting as a mechanical dampener mitigating the otherwise extremely high current spikes.) Using something like Omni wheels to minimize frictional losses when turning can also make a big difference. An inefficient collector or generous use of motors for auxiliary non-drivetrain actions can also be a huge factor that is often overlooked. Of course, stalling 6 CIMs will heat the breakers faster than any other individual action, and is generally the last thing that was happening before the breaker trips, and so is most frequently looked at. Pushing can often be the last large rock on the camel's back, but you can't forget all the straw you heaped up their earlier. Hopefully this clarifies some of my thoughts on the subject. Cheers, Bryan Last edited by BJC : 09-10-2014 at 22:29. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|