New England Teams To-Be-Registered

[Joe G.]

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

Here is a team list from this day last year if you want to see how many vet 2014 teams were still not registered at that point.
Just to see how it's happened in the past.

Looking through the list, I see 2871, 3280, and 4793 as not being registered at this time last year either.

I will point out that the current registration map in New England is quite stark. We have full events at Nashua, Reading, UNH, Northeastern, and Hartford, with very significant slots remaining at the other five events (Dartmouth has only 11 teams!). I could easily believe that a few of these teams are double-waitlisted if they were slow to register for whatever reason. For a significant number of the missing teams, Reading/Northeastern would seem to be the geographically logical event pairing, both of which filled quite quickly once second registration opened. On the other end of the spectrum, there are a number of missing teams from Maine, whose event has been historically slow to fill, putting less pressure on these teams to register quickly.

[BrendanB]

Originally Posted by Joe G.

Looking through the list, I see 2871, 3280, and 4793 as not being registered at this time last year either.

I will point out that the current registration map in New England is quite stark. We have full events at Nashua, Reading, UNH, Northeastern, and Hartford, with very significant slots remaining at the other five events (Dartmouth has only 11 teams!). I could easily believe that a few of these teams are double-waitlisted if they were slow to register for whatever reason. For a significant number of the missing teams, Reading/Northeastern would seem to be the geographically logical event pairing, both of which filled quite quickly once second registration opened. On the other end of the spectrum, there are a number of missing teams from Maine, whose event has been historically slow to fill, putting less pressure on these teams to register quickly.

It is interesting how Week 3 in NE is currently the quietest week of competitions after the second wave of registration with only 37 teams signed up (26 at Pine Tree and 11 at Dartmouth).

We shall see when another wave of registration opens and teams sign up for their third events. I know our team and others aren't planning to register for a third and condensing the schedule down to 5 weeks can deter more third events as there are only a select few events you can sign up for to avoid competing on back to back weekends. Totally doable but we aren't jumping at it.

[The_ShamWOW88]

Chances are, they may be waitlisted currently and when additional district registration opens, additional slots will open at "full" events right now, considering there will probably be 40 teams or so such was the case with WPI last season.

Interestingly enough, FIRST as a whole, there still seems to be 470 or so teams that played last season that haven't registered.

[Joe G.]

Originally Posted by BrendanB

It is interesting how Week 3 in NE is currently the quietest week of competitions after the second wave of registration with only 37 teams signed up (26 at Pine Tree and 11 at Dartmouth).

We shall see when another wave of registration opens and teams sign up for their third events. I know our team and others aren't planning to register for a third and condensing the schedule down to 5 weeks can deter more third events as there are only a select few events you can sign up for to avoid competing on back to back weekends. Totally doable but we aren't jumping at it.

With the five week schedule, 1/3/5 is the only way to do three events without doing anything back to back. Since Pine Tree and Umass Dartmouth are arguably the two most remote New England Events, I could imagine that a large number of teams trying to do this schedule registered for their Week 1 and 5 events first, in order to try to get their home events first, and beat the registration rush for Nashua, Hartford, and Northeastern, all of which have a history of filling fast (and did again this year). I know that we seriously considered taking this course of action, before ultimately settling on attempting a 1/4/5 schedule.

[Andrew Schreiber]

Originally Posted by Joe G.

before ultimately settling on attempting a 1/4/5 schedule.

Back to back isn't THAT bad.


Back to Back to Back to Back however...