|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should event waitlists be more transparent? | |||
| Yes |
|
134 | 76.57% |
| No |
|
41 | 23.43% |
| Voters: 175. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Being wait listed most of the time means you probably won't get in. Teams do not usually pull out
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Quote:
All events this year have 15 spots reserved, that's what teams are waitlisted for. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
The problem we found last year is that by the time we found out we didn't have a slot at our 2nd regional, there were very few regionals available with open slots.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
That's the chance we take sitting on a wait list. We traveled 8 hours last year because I didn't feel comfortable waiting on the list. The wait listed event was begging folks to fill their event right up to end. If I had known that, we would have sat on the list. Sometimes, you can't win for losing.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Quote:
Right now the best solution is to contact the RD and ask. Maybe a better solution would be to have the RDs contact the teams with a simple "Hey, I saw you are on the waitlist for _____, but I know that 14 of the 15 reserved slots are already earmarked for other teams so you may want to consider trying another regional." |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
In theory, there shouldn't be an issue with publishing the waitlist just like how they publish officially registered teams. That way you see a waitlist that
1) tells you how many teams are on the waitlist 2) what teams are on the waitlist but it doesn't tell you when or in what order the team registered. We can still keep the implicit criteria and discretion of the RD, but I don't see why the data has to be behind a wall. In reality, you would just need a few people who wouldn't understand that kind of process and get upset with FIRST for not explaining it to them properly. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
FYI,
Our good friends from 1717 have decided once again to join us at LVR. Sometimes it's worth traveling extra miles for the opportunity to attend a great regional ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
1717 has just registered for the Ventura regional. Do you know if they will still be attending LVR as a third?
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Ah. For some reason I was thinking LVR was week 6.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Can I get that secret registration link too? ....
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Have you spoke with the RD?
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
Good Point Adam.
Perhaps FIRST should note to teams that if you need more info on the status of your pending registration at an event, talk to the RD. We definitely talk to RD's prior to signing up for any event. I'm not so sure everyone knows that they are the best source of information about event capacity. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
When there is online registration system, there is no need to contact RD by phone or e-mail. It doesn't make sense! As teams are put on wait list just give them a number or something, so they can make decision.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Event Waitlist and Capacity Transparency
When you're trying to make a decision, and the information is NOT AVAILABLE online, then you SHOULD contact the RD. Particularly when the list--and coming off of it--is mainly in the RD's hands.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|