|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Quote:
If nothing on my robot is moving, then rps = 0, and my robot can hold no weight, according to that equation. The weight which a robot can hold depends on the strength of what supports the weight. Why do the number of wheels, strength of drive, or speed at which the robot is travelling have anything to do with how much weight can be held? What units are you using for torque? For wheel radius? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Ok. So here is my new equation:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8zt...p=docslist_api Problem is, this equation does not factor in speed needed. How would I add that to the equation? |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Would you please answer the questions posed by the previous posters?
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Ok. So we fixed the equation, just remove the RPS. Our we are solving for W (Which is maximum stalling weight in newtons).
The last thing needed is how to add in a minimum top speed. Radius is in meters, torque is Nm, everything is metric. Last edited by Mad Cows : 28-10-2014 at 15:11. Reason: answered more questions |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this Equation Correct
Quote:
"maximum stalling weight" as a function of "minimum top speed" is not a completely unambiguous description. Here's a case where more words would probably be better than fewer. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|