|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
$100 for this is a very good price, although I'm wondering how you're getting past the cost of what I assume is a 2 stage planetary transmission. Best of luck in your endeavors.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Look up eccentric gearbox...it's not planetary. I'd love to see the insides of this....
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Do you have estimates on backlash and efficiency numbers?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Excellent questions.
Any chance you can provide these? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Good questions.
The backlash is somewhere around 1-3 degrees. As for the efficiency, I really don't have the right equipment to measure that right now. It is abs plastic and it's not melting, if that's saying anything. Attached is a picture showing whats going on inside. The gearbox ended up being pretty simple, kind of ironic considering the path it took to get to this point. -Andrew |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Do you have any maximum torque figures?
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
How can we buy one?
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
|
|
#10
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
This gearbox is known in the industrial robotics industry as an epicyclic gearbox and is very common in robots that require low backlash and high gear reduction.
A couple of business and technical points: 1. There are MANY patents on this design. Several of them have expired but a few key ones still exist so do a patent search before selling this. 2. This design looks to only have one stage going in a single direction. This will induce severe oscillations that cause torque ripple which are detrimental to high load arm applications. There are ways to solve this but it adds significant cost. 3. In order to get acceptable efficiency the oscillating gear must have a very smooth surface finish. Grinding that surface is a must or I would not use it. Plastic gearing for this will severely limit the load carrying capability. That's all I can think of now. Paul |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Michael, I torqued the gearbox unpowered with some lever arms until it broke apart. I would estimate that it reached around 50 ft-lbs.
Adam, I built a website, I'm a mechanical engineer so no making fun of it looking like its from 2004, I need to go through the rules on mentioning trademarked names or just delete them, after I do that I'll post the website address and they can be purchased through the Paypal payment system with a credit card. Paul, I did some patent searching, I couldn't find anything that the design violated, If you know something in particular that may be a problem I would welcome any information. I haven't experienced oscillations besides having to counterweight the input cam/oscillator. Plastic gears do have their limits, obviously I wouldn't recommend this for an industrial robot, but for FRC robot that needs to run for limited amount of time, I believe it can work. -Andrew |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Cool project! Very cool that you'll be able to sell them.
It seems like whenever I talk about 3D printing at work (that's all the time), someone always suggests that I use printed parts to make my own metal castings. It seems easiest to do something like lost-ABS investment casting, taking advantage of ABS's low melting point. Seems like this would be the perfect project to try this out. Where you have mating surfaces, you could add additional thickness and clean them up in a mill to get closer to the requisite surface finish. Last edited by Nate Laverdure : 01-11-2014 at 07:07. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
These drives are very cool...I've been working to create a useful one for about three years.
I haven't released a unit for FRC because of the immense challenges. I won't detail them here, but I will tell you that we have a "large" box of failed iterations. I've attached a picture of a 400:1 unit with a 2.5" OD and an 8mm CIM input. Here is a video....these are from May 2013. http://youtu.be/tJoWlCDmaLg |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
I second this. This looks pretty slick.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gearbox for mechanism or appendage
Oh whoops, I missed that part of the description. Planetary seems more "normal" to me for large reductions.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|