Go to Post There will always be a point in your FIRST experience when you realize you can get away with something that is against the rules. It is at that point when you have a choice to make about your own personal ethics, and what sort of example you will set for your students. - ToddF [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-11-2014, 17:06
Monochron's Avatar
Monochron Monochron is offline
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Brian O'Sullivan
FRC #4561 (TerrorBytes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Posts: 914
Monochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Something New - SWE Grant

Our team will continue to strive to provide excellent leadership opportunities, engineering opportunities, and professional experience to our female members rather than attempt to qualify for this grant. I imagine most FIRST teams will do the same. Encouraging affirmative action is neither gracious nor professional.




Now, to play a bit of devil's advocate, I think I can see SWE's line of thinking. Their goal may be to promote and grow programs where girls have ample opportunity to succeed. They may also think that their requirements (50%, female driver, etc.) indicate a program where girls have ample opportunity to succeed. I think this is strangely restrictive, but I can at least see their line of thinking. If a team is 50% female and at least one female is on the drive team, that team is almost certainly helping to give girls opportunities in STEM.

It worry's me though that they think that an organization that doesn't meet those restrictions is not worth funding. As if having less than 50% and an all male drive team means that you MUST be prohibiting females from excelling (even if unintentionally). If this is true, it is disturbing and sets a terrible example for FIRST. Maybe there is another way to explain the restrictive requirements...

Last edited by Monochron : 03-11-2014 at 17:09.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi