Go to Post Baker, Skierkeiwicz, one more word out of you two and I'll have to pull out the Clipboard of Doom :p - Jessica Boucher [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-10-2014, 17:15
75vs1885's Avatar
75vs1885 75vs1885 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Stephen
FRC #1885 (Ilite)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 87
75vs1885 will become famous soon enough
1885's prototype...first version

So this is team 1885's ilite Robotics prototype. It is a 6 wheel chain driven drive with 4 inch colson wheels. This is just our preseason version, we plan on using a shifter gearbox, depending on the game. We used 2x1 box for the motor sides, and 80/20 for the adjacent sides. We used a West Coast Productions (WCP) single speed gear box.
How do you like it?!?!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Drivetrain.jpg
Views:	345
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	17436  
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-10-2014, 19:10
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,098
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

I really like the use of 80/20 extrusion for the front and back framing members - it provides a remarkably simple construction method that I wouldn't have thought of myself. I'm usually not a big fan of 80/20 as anything other than a prototype material, but this looks to me like a very good solution.

Be cautious with the 6-CIM single-speed drive if you use it on your competition bot - it's very easy to trip your main breaker if your gearing is too aggressive (we found this out the hard way last year). Shifters are definitely the way to go.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016

Last edited by Oblarg : 31-10-2014 at 19:12.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-10-2014, 20:38
75vs1885's Avatar
75vs1885 75vs1885 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Stephen
FRC #1885 (Ilite)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 87
75vs1885 will become famous soon enough
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
I really like the use of 80/20 extrusion for the front and back framing members - it provides a remarkably simple construction method that I wouldn't have thought of myself. I'm usually not a big fan of 80/20 as anything other than a prototype material, but this looks to me like a very good solution.

Be cautious with the 6-CIM single-speed drive if you use it on your competition bot - it's very easy to trip your main breaker if your gearing is too aggressive (we found this out the hard way last year). Shifters are definitely the way to go.
Thanks!
We wouldn't use 6 cims if we had a single speed, the gearbox has the capability to have 6, but it isn't necessary for our purposes. Although, I don't know if we would use 6 with a shifter.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-11-2014, 02:55
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is online now
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,224
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

Quote:
Originally Posted by 75vs1885 View Post
Thanks!
We wouldn't use 6 cims if we had a single speed, the gearbox has the capability to have 6, but it isn't necessary for our purposes. Although, I don't know if we would use 6 with a shifter.
Use at least 4 cims for drive IMO. Very few manpulators on a bot will need more than 2 cims for power.

Shifting is a great thing for 6 cims, as you can use the low gear for positioning the robot for accuray, and the high gear for moving at 18fps+.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-11-2014, 20:00
75vs1885's Avatar
75vs1885 75vs1885 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Stephen
FRC #1885 (Ilite)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 87
75vs1885 will become famous soon enough
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
Use at least 4 cims for drive IMO. Very few manpulators on a bot will need more than 2 cims for power.

Shifting is a great thing for 6 cims, as you can use the low gear for positioning the robot for accuray, and the high gear for moving at 18fps+.
for such a light test bot we don't really need to much power. Its only about 25lbs. So we'd be wasting a good cim if we had 4.
The only purpose of this bot is to get drivers practice and prove a theory that one of our mentors had.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2014, 10:18
Monochron's Avatar
Monochron Monochron is offline
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Brian O'Sullivan
FRC #4561 (TerrorBytes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Posts: 905
Monochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

Quote:
Originally Posted by 75vs1885 View Post
for such a light test bot we don't really need to much power. Its only about 25lbs. So we'd be wasting a good cim if we had 4.
The only purpose of this bot is to get drivers practice and prove a theory that one of our mentors had.
FYI driver practice is generally somewhat useless on a system with radically different drive characteristics from a finished product. If you are giving non-drivers a chance to practice driving something, that is useful though. And building prototypes is ALWAYS useful!
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2014, 10:21
notmattlythgoe's Avatar
notmattlythgoe notmattlythgoe is offline
Flywheel Police
AKA: Matthew Lythgoe
FRC #2363 (Triple Helix)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,721
notmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monochron View Post
FYI driver practice is generally somewhat useless on a system with radically different drive characteristics from a finished product. If you are giving non-drivers a chance to practice driving something, that is useful though. And building prototypes is ALWAYS useful!
Driver practice on a non similar bot during the season is not as beneficial (but practice is practice), however during the offseason any practice is beneficial, even if it is on a robot that is nothing like your in season robot. Just being able to learn the control layout and get comfortable driving is a huge benefit.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-11-2014, 13:48
Teched3 Teched3 is offline
Hodge1
FRC #0175 (BuzzRobotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 319
Teched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud ofTeched3 has much to be proud of
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

I would suggest adding a weight box to bring it up to competition weight of 150 lbs with bumpers added so they get used to size. Then test with different motor configurations while driver training. You will gain more from this than drivers just getting used to controls. Your programmers can use this platform to test autonomous modes as well. A light robot will have very different characteristics than an "up to weight" robot. Also, corner braces to stiffen the chassis from racking, along with a shear panel or belly pan.
__________________
Sweat the details
Why is there never enough time to do it right, but always enough time to do it again!
Even if you're on the right track, if you sit still, you'll get run over!!!
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-11-2014, 13:57
75vs1885's Avatar
75vs1885 75vs1885 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Stephen
FRC #1885 (Ilite)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 87
75vs1885 will become famous soon enough
Re: 1885's prototype...first version

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teched3 View Post
I would suggest adding a weight box to bring it up to competition weight of 150 lbs with bumpers added so they get used to size. Then test with different motor configurations while driver training. You will gain more from this than drivers just getting used to controls. Your programmers can use this platform to test autonomous modes as well. A light robot will have very different characteristics than an "up to weight" robot. Also, corner braces to stiffen the chassis from racking, along with a shear panel or belly pan.
Or we can just throw a shooter on it
but transitioning from a 4 wheel direct drive to a 6 wheel chain drive is different.....
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi