|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
A CAN Bus does not have increased latency when more devices are added. They are all wired in parallel. The addressing is dealt with when the address is placed on the bus.
The only worry is that a dead device or bad cable can kill the entire bus, so troubleshooting a dead bus is a matter of splitting the bus into sections to see when it starts working. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
Changing from the Jaguar's RJ12 connectors to the Weidmuller terminals is going to reduce cable and wiring issues significantly. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
Of course the Talon SRX has no Weidmuller connector, so Talon to Talon will just be twisted or soldered or some custom connector. would be good if there were a Weidmuller block created that allowed a bunch of them to be all connected. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
Quote:
The Talon SRX has two sets of CAN pigtails. I don't really see that working well in a star topology, alas. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
The CAN spec calls a line structure. You might get away with a star topology, but it is not recommended by specification.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/all...25795A000FC025 |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
I was just looking at a pile of Talon SRXs that we bought for this year's robot. Those green/yellow pigtails sure look like a nuisance to connect!
They want to be daisy chained, so an "in" and an "out" connector as male/female pairs make sense to use. I'd love a standardized connector for CAN bus on these robots, but it looks like the folks at CTRE didn't think this was important. Can we make one? I like those crimp terminals that go into Hirose, Molex, TE or whatever housings, but there are unfortunately about a hundred incompatible types out there. Suggestions? How do you plan to connect Talon CAN wires to each other? |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
We're going to do our initial wiring using Wago Lever-nuts. Perhaps in a few weeks we'll have come up with an array of Weidmuller terminal blocks on a simple circuit board.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|