|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What will be the most effective robot this year? (select all that apply) | |||
| Ball Harvester w/Dumper |
|
20 | 23.26% |
| Ball Harvester w/Direct Deposit into Goals |
|
29 | 33.72% |
| Goal Controller (1 goal) |
|
24 | 27.91% |
| Goal Controller (2 goal) |
|
42 | 48.84% |
| Goal Controller (3 Goal |
|
19 | 22.09% |
| Bully Bot (take out balls from goals) |
|
12 | 13.95% |
| X-tendo bot (extends to reach Home Zone) |
|
20 | 23.26% |
| Ball Shooter |
|
14 | 16.28% |
| Speedy Robot |
|
36 | 41.86% |
| Powerful Robot |
|
49 | 56.98% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
What will be the most effective robot type this year
vote so we can compare the results of the poll to the results of competition
Last edited by Rick : 09-01-2002 at 18:30. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
3 goals would yield a low score for your oponents and thus you would get a low score also.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
You would get a low score in qualification rounds, but being able to keep the opponent's score very low will come in handy in the finals if you get picked.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
3 goals
youll get picked for the elimination matches if u win all ur qualification matches
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
With a dominating capability like that, I think it is likely you'd also get picked for finals... I mean, if a robot can grab all 3 goals it effectively dominates the playingfield... in the finals who cares about balance... shut em out, by giving them NO way to score...
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
A three goal controlling robot wouldn't necessarily be a three goal scoring robot. A robot could hold all three in the center of the field, rotate, and effectively fine-tune the score to whatever it needed to be by rotating.
The trouble is building a robot that, once it has the three goals, can do something with them. - those goals are huge lever arms. up against two quality robots, could easily be pushed around by a robot at the end of the goal - unless they've already thought of that. Oh no!! I've said too much! ![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The goals may be lever arms, but they turn a 130 lb robot into a (assuming 180 lbs/goal) 670 lb robot. That's quite a large unyieldy mass to move...
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Benji, that's not entiraly true...
In '99 I drove 308's machine to be 6-0, one of only 2 teams to do that. We didn't get picked up. It's all how you market yourself and the luck of the draw. Just don't forget about those ball handelers.... with a good ball harvester you only need 1 goal to win.... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
one goal speedy direct deposit
If a speedy robot can get one goal and fill it up with 30-50 balls in under 40 seconds while avoiding having the goal stolen (I'd think it'd be hard to steal a fast moving goal with an evasive driver) as one of our designs should be able to do, that's 50-70 points assuming that our partner gets ten points (at least) by just sitting there. This seems easier to me than trying to chase down and catch all 3 goals, getting you 40 points vs 30 MAX assuming the same thing about your partner. Also, if the balls are in the game, it will probably be a much higher scoring match and thus give a higher multiplier to the winner.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much planning goes into your robot? | Jnadke | General Forum | 41 | 29-01-2006 21:29 |
| Image Discuss: 810 - Minotaur: Coming to a regional near you. | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 47 | 25-02-2003 16:19 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
| Basedoes this type of robot seem like it would be picked? | Mullen | Regional Competitions | 3 | 14-03-2002 11:42 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |