pic: 3 CIM WCD Ball Shifter CAD

[Bryce2471]

Originally Posted by AdamHeard

I started this way, and now prefer the method in the video that Chris linked.

We try to go with thinner plates, and skip pocketing alltogether, so the style lends itself well to that as well.

I hate parts blowing up on changes, so the connect the dots method is a no go for me.

Granted. I'm a grumpy jerk and hate tedious/manual CAD methods. I don't have the energy to brute force with dumb methods like I used to when I was younger.

I prefer thicker plates because they support the bearing better.
I figure, if we're going to use a CNC machine to cut the plates, we may as well pocket them.

I've found that if you use formulas for as many dimensions as possible, use constraints to eliminate as many dimensions as possible, and use rule fillets instead of manual ones, then most changes won't take nearly as much effort.