|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: December Design Competition 2014: Tubular Touchdown
With 100 footballs at their disposal, it seems very feasible that someone could make a team 71 in 2002 type bot, just pull a goal (or both) up to the feeder station, lock in place, and for the entire time before fourth down just funnel/chuck in balls.
That just seems like way too easy a way to do well in the game. Maybe less footballs should be available? Last edited by pabeekm : 03-12-2014 at 00:44. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: December Design Competition 2014: Tubular Touchdown
What made 71 so deadly wasn't just the design, but the execution. These days with the added robots and the more powerful drive systems I don't think a 71 style robot would be effective in this game. It was something we all discussed before choosing it. I am in no way saying that it is better to go with a safer design, but a risky design like 71's requires proof of perfect execution to be successful, and that's proof that is hard to conjure in a design competition such as this one.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: December Design Competition 2014: Tubular Touchdown
It looks like about 190 footballs will fit in the rolling goal. I have simulated it and got 184 to fit. Anyone willing to verify that?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: December Design Competition 2014: Tubular Touchdown
Is the ' 2" high 1" wide ' speed bump a typo? Based on the picture it looks like a semicircle.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: December Design Competition 2014: Tubular Touchdown
You may be misreading - the document shows 2" high (2 inches high) and 1' wide (1 foot wide)
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|