Go to Post Above all, have fun and, if you need help, ask for it... Your inspectors will be glad to help or try to arrange for another team to help you. This should not be a traumatic experience! - Mike Betts [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > Rumor Mill
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 17:47
brandon.cottrell's Avatar
brandon.cottrell brandon.cottrell is offline
Vice President
FRC #1266 (The Devil Duckies)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 235
brandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud of
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeTwo View Post
However, at our regional, and the others I saw on video, most alliances wound up consisting of one robot playing offense and two on defense. Alliances with two good offensive robots would put two on offense and one on defense to get the truss and assist points. I don't recall anyone at our regional successfully using a 3-assist strategy.
Really? Where'd you guys go?

At San Diego (which then was a Week 2 regional) the minimum was more like 2 robots assisting, and 1 playing defense. I will note however in matches like this one, sometimes, but for the most part it was generally 2 assists, even if it was a slow match with only a couple cycles on either side. However, this may have just been because we were matched with/against some pretty good teams who could assist in some way or another.

But in AA you were usually supposed to play defense if you didn't have to currently do anything related to the ball.

In the Elims, it was always 3. 1 inbounds into another, that one trusses, one after that scores usually, which was why robots like 3250, 4574, 4583 and 4486 were such good strategic picks.


All in all, I think we can all agree that the simplicity of Aerial Assist was its strong point and it's downfall. On one hand, the game was fairly easy to follow, and even if you didn't understand what assisting was you could still get a basic grasp of which side was winning based on general activity, like in Ultimate Ascent, or Rebound Rumble. On the other hand, to engineers it wasn't very challenging, and there were only so many designs that could be innovated. Plus not to mention the sometimes speculation-based rules, and the lack of a 2nd objective (which lead to a heavy focus on a single game piece).
__________________
2012 Battle at the Border Winners
2014 San Diego Regional Winners
2014 Las Vegas Engineering Inspiration
2015 Battle at the Border Winners
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 17:53
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,109
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBray_T1296 View Post
Aerial Assist, with the 2010 bumps!

But seriously I think whatever game is next year will require that we throw last year's drivetrain out the window. There will be some difficult obstacles to drive over, that our superflat robots won't be able to handle
Judging from the kitbot extrusion drawings that were released, I doubt this.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 17:58
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon.cottrell View Post
to engineers it wasn't very challenging
Can you expand on why you think this please?
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 18:12
brandon.cottrell's Avatar
brandon.cottrell brandon.cottrell is offline
Vice President
FRC #1266 (The Devil Duckies)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 235
brandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud ofbrandon.cottrell has much to be proud of
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Sykes View Post
Can you expand on why you think this please?
Well think about games like Ultimate Ascent, the whole "pyramid climbing" goal.

Sure, it wasn't worth very many points, but to have a robot that actually did that was eye candy for spectators. Everyone I talk to about Ultimate Ascent outside of FIRST cites the Pyramid as the most amazing thing about the game, because of the complex mechanisms robots had to do them. Like, this and this.

In terms of shooting frisbees it was just a spinning wheel with a piston to push the frisbees in, with varying input methods like floor pickup or human player feeding. Though the latter was easily a larger source of points, it was still easier to engineer, whereas the former was a harder, but more visually appealing task.

With this game, all the robots really had to be successful was have a consistent way to hold and release the ball. You didn't even really need to launch it, and there were a lot of cases where launching it would've just created more problems than simply holding the ball and then letting goal of it.

What this lead to is many "cookie-cutter" robots and strategies, which is the main reason people don't like games like Lunacy. Even though nobody is really "copying" anyone, it's hard to bring a new innovating idea that will actually work and be consistent.
__________________
2012 Battle at the Border Winners
2014 San Diego Regional Winners
2014 Las Vegas Engineering Inspiration
2015 Battle at the Border Winners

Last edited by brandon.cottrell : 14-12-2014 at 18:17.
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 18:40
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,109
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon.cottrell View Post
What this lead to is many "cookie-cutter" robots and strategies, which is the main reason people don't like games like Lunacy. Even though nobody is really "copying" anyone, it's hard to bring a new innovating idea that will actually work and be consistent.
Of all the reasons I despise Lunacy, cookie cutter robots is not really one of them. In fact, this is the first time I've heard that particular criticism levied at that game.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 19:01
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,224
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
Of all the reasons I despise Lunacy, cookie cutter robots is not really one of them. In fact, this is the first time I've heard that particular criticism levied at that game.
lol that's an interesting way of loooking at that.

On the topic of creativity in AA, adding a good endgame would have been enough to make it more creative. 2013 was just shooting frisbees with wheels, either with a linear shooter or a single-wheel shooter. However, it would have been very hard to top 148's pyramid climb in terms of creativity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxGa8Z8LUYE
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 19:03
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon.cottrell View Post
Well think about games like Ultimate Ascent, the whole "pyramid climbing" goal.

Sure, it wasn't worth very many points, but to have a robot that actually did that was eye candy for spectators. Everyone I talk to about Ultimate Ascent outside of FIRST cites the Pyramid as the most amazing thing about the game, because of the complex mechanisms robots had to do them. Like, this and this.
I don't understand how those examples are that much more amazing than this and this.

Quote:
With this game, all the robots really had to be successful was have a consistent way to hold and release the ball. You didn't even really need to launch it, and there were a lot of cases where launching it would've just created more problems than simply holding the ball and then letting goal of it.
This statement (with small variations) could probably be said for any game. For example: "[With Ultimate Ascent], all the robots really needed to be successful was to have a consistent way to hold and release [discs into the low goal]. You don't even really need to launch it, and there were a lot of cases where launching it would've just created more problems than simply holding the [discs] and then letting go of [them]."

Quote:
What this lead to is many "cookie-cutter" robots and strategies, which is the main reason people don't like games like Lunacy. Even though nobody is really "copying" anyone, it's hard to bring a new innovating idea that will actually work and be consistent.
It seems that you are more commenting on unique designs here, which is a very different issue than a game that did not provide a difficult engineering challenge.
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 19:22
Ben Wolsieffer Ben Wolsieffer is offline
Dartmouth 2020
AKA: lopsided98
FRC #2084 (Robots by the C)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Manchester, MA (Hanover, NH)
Posts: 520
Ben Wolsieffer has much to be proud ofBen Wolsieffer has much to be proud ofBen Wolsieffer has much to be proud ofBen Wolsieffer has much to be proud ofBen Wolsieffer has much to be proud ofBen Wolsieffer has much to be proud ofBen Wolsieffer has much to be proud ofBen Wolsieffer has much to be proud of
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
However, it would have been very hard to top 148's pyramid climb in terms of creativity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxGa8Z8LUYE
Sorry this is off topic but... http://youtu.be/MsRTBzIZonc?t=1m
Looks awesome, but its probably the worst possibly way to climb - especially if you're the driver.
__________________



2016 North Shore District - Semifinalists and Excellence in Engineering Award
2015 Northeastern University District - Semifinalists and Creativity Award
2014 Granite State District - Semifinalists and Innovation in Control Award
2012 Boston Regional - Finalists
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2014, 22:06
wajirock's Avatar
wajirock wajirock is offline
Safety General
AKA: Mohammed W.
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 55
wajirock has a spectacular aura aboutwajirock has a spectacular aura about
Re: What if...

Aerial Assist played on the field of Lunacy with two pyramids in the center that you had to send a minibot to the top! There are 4 goals you can score in and in center there are two bumps that span the width of the field! It's basically a mashup of the past 5 games.
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-12-2014, 00:25
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,658
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon.cottrell View Post
Really? Where'd you guys go?
We've played at the Bayou Regional in Kenner, LA. 3400's the median team number at Bayou for 2015 (between 3337 and 3468), so most of the teams are still relatively new, and last year, we had about a dozen robots that consisted of only a drive system, a drive system with a "box" to hold the ball, or had essentially non-functional manipulators. Curiously, we have no rookie teams scheduled this year - the newest were rookies last year. However, of the regionals I checked out on video (perhaps four, but I don't recall which), the effective game strategies didn't seem much different.

I also generally agree with the criticism that AA didn't offer enough "engineering challenge". While dealing the big ball was hardly trivial, there were no competing requirements that forced compromise. Apart from the 10 points of "mobility" which simply involved driving forward about ten feet in autonomous, every point to be earned involved manipulating the ball. With UA, there were competing space requirements - we'd have loved to be taller or heavier, but then we wouldn't have been able to get inside the pyramid for the much easier "inside climb", and/or been slower about it. For RR, there were definite height (for basketball) vs stability (for crossing bridges or the hump) tradeoffs. Checking back on some research I did this summer, every game since 1999 excepting 2000 and 2014 seemed to involve an "endgame bonus" which was distinct from, and often in design conflict with, the "main game".
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-12-2014, 00:55
Gregor's Avatar
Gregor Gregor is offline
#StickToTheStratisQuo
AKA: Gregor Browning
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,447
Gregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Sykes View Post
This statement (with small variations) could probably be said for any game. For example: "[With Ultimate Ascent], all the robots really needed to be successful was to have a consistent way to hold and release [discs into the low goal]. You don't even really need to launch it, and there were a lot of cases where launching it would've just created more problems than simply holding the [discs] and then letting go of [them]."
I did not see one successful alliance in Ultimate Ascent whose strategy was entirely focused around the low goal. The same cannot be said for AA, where quite often it was the better option.
__________________
What are nationals? Sounds like a fun American party, can we Canadians come?
“For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.” -Jean Dubuffet
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -Albert Einstein
FLL 2011-2015 Glen Ames Robotics-Student, Mentor
FRC 2012-2013 Team 907-Scouting Lead, Strategy Lead, Human Player, Driver
FRC 2014-2015 Team 1310-Mechanical, Electrical, Drive Captain
FRC 2011-xxxx Volunteer
How I came to be a FIRSTer
<Since 2011
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-12-2014, 01:16
Abhishek R Abhishek R is offline
Registered User
FRC #0624
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 892
Abhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregor View Post
I did not see one successful alliance in Ultimate Ascent whose strategy was entirely focused around the low goal. The same cannot be said for AA, where quite often it was the better option.
Agreed. Mathematically, it just makes sense. A robot scoring 4 discs in the high goal scores 200% more points than a robot scoring 4 discs in the low goal. In AA however, a robot scoring a 3 assist ball in the high goal scored only 29% more points. There is a clear advantage to the robot that can score in the high goal.
__________________
2012 - 2015 : 624 CRyptonite
Team Website
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-12-2014, 01:45
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregor View Post
I did not see one successful alliance in Ultimate Ascent whose strategy was entirely focused around the low goal. The same cannot be said for AA, where quite often it was the better option.
In 2013, a robot that scored 2 low goal auto discs and 4 4-disc low goal cycles would have been an above average robot. In 2014, a robot that could successfully pick up and score the ball in the low goal, doing both of these tasks consistently and quickly was probably above average (although I don't have solid data on this). These tasks seem to be of comparable difficulty to me.

The reason entire strategies in UA did not revolve around the low goal was that there were almost no robots that were designed to score there. In contrast, almost all robots in AA were designed to have the capability to gain possession of the ball and release it. The lack of low-goal strategies in UA does nothing to discredit their potential in my opinion. An alliance of 3 successful low goal scoring robots (especially if they could 10 point climb) in UA could easily have been a force to be reckoned with come elims.
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-12-2014, 08:22
connor.worley's Avatar
connor.worley connor.worley is offline
Registered User
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Berkeley/San Diego
Posts: 601
connor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Sykes View Post
The reason entire strategies in UA did not revolve around the low goal was that there were almost no robots that were designed to score there.
If you consider why nobody designed for the low goal, you'll find why nobody used low goal strategies.
__________________
Team 973 (2016-???)
Team 5499 (2015-2016)
Team 254 (2014-2015)

Team 1538 (2011-2014)
2014 Driver (25W 17L 1T)
日本語でOK
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-12-2014, 11:10
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if...

Quote:
Originally Posted by connor.worley View Post
If you consider why nobody designed for the low goal, you'll find why nobody used low goal strategies.
In my personal opinion, the reason many low-resource teams did not design for the low goal was because they incorrectly assumed that high goal shooting would be required to be successful. However, this is now becoming something like a circular argument, and it is difficult to tell what event was the cause and what event was the effect.

4656 was a local example of a successful low goal scoring robot. As a rookie team with a single active mechanism besides their drivetrain, they got picked early in the second round, beating out many veteran teams with far more complicated designs.

All that I am trying to say is that there is always a minimum competitive concept each year, and I don't think that making the MCC for AA was a drastically easier challenge than making the MCC for any other game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi